Inadmissible under Article 6 § 1 (impartiality of trial judge) - The issue determined in the bail revocation proceedings was entirely distinct from the question of the applicant’s guilt or innocence: the

Conviction in issue not directed against applicant's right to inform in an objective manner about public figure's trial but against unfavourable assessment of an element of evidence at the trial – applicant

More specifically, during his pre-trial detention in the Vinnytsya pre-trial detention centre (“the SIZO”), on 27   February 2010 the applicant sustained serious injuries, including a skull fracture

An obvious example is where DNA evidence, not obtainable at the time of trial, shows beyond doubt that the defendant was not guilty of the offence.

Did the Supreme Court’s refusal to seek an advisory opinion from the EFTA Court violate the applicant’s right to a fair trial as guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention?

    Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. 3.

It held that the finding of the applicant’s guilt had been corroborated by statements of victims and witnesses, expert reports, the applicant’s own statements and other evidence.

It held that the finding of the applicant’s guilt had been corroborated by statements of victims and witnesses, expert reports, the applicant’s own statements and other evidence.

    The applicant pleaded not guilty at the trial and contested the veracity of the statements of the witnesses made during the investigation of the case in Kazakhstan. 22.

[Localité 3] non comparante, ni représentée Monsieur [G] [F] [Adresse 5] [Localité 3] non comparant, ni représenté COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL : Président : Lucie PARCHEMAL, Juge Greffier : Odile GUIDAT

Elle soutient que : elle n’a pas été convoquée en mairie préalablement au prononcé de la sanction ; elle a déposé un jouet dans un endroit prévu pour le tri et non sur la voie publique, pour qu’il

The investigating authorities had had material evidence of their guilt.

guilty of [these] crimes.

skyldspørsmålet) cannot be a ground for "appeal" (section 335), but for a new trial.

The incident of 26 July 2016 and pre-trial investigation 5 .

    alleged violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trial (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention), to be presumed innocent until proved guilty (Article 6 § 2 of the Convention) and to respect

in the proceedings before the trial court.

the trial against the appellant.

    Did the applicants’ convictions by the Supreme Court constitute a breach of their right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

Dumas, président, Mme Tric, conseiller rapporteur, M. Tricot, conseiller, M.