On 13 August 1993 applicant’s counsel obtained copies of the records on the questioning of witness K. to the extent that they related to the applicant.

He claimed that cooperation between the social welfare officials and the substitute family had been difficult.

At a disputed time between 12.00 and 12.30 a number of officers intercepted S.P. in the hallway leading to his apartment and restrained him, using force.

In fact, the Government did not submit a single copy of those complaints pertaining to the relevant time.

He did not hear and could hardly talk.

No copies thereof were provided by the Government. 107.

    On 24 July 2017 the applicant’s lawyer sent a copy of that judgment to the Deputy Minister to be appended to his written comments (see paragraph   12 above). 16 .

Since ordinary copies, as opposed to certified copies, had no evidentiary value, the applicant asked the trial court to obtain the originals.

Kosonen , Legal Adviser,       Ministry for Foreign Affairs,   Co-agent,     Mr J.

of documents in their cells and there had been restrictions on their receiving copies of documents from their lawyers).

The applicants kept copies of some of these complaints and submitted them to the Court.

The Minister therefore advised the COA to prolong the provision of reception and care facilities to the applicant until 8 January 2004.

Moreover, in respect of the Prosecutor’s predominant role in the Russian administration, which can hardly be described as limited or exceptional, the Prosecutor’s Office does not seem to conform to the

However, the motion had been rejected because the company had insufficient assets to   cover the costs of the insolvency procedure. 10.

He also asked for copies of the relevant decisions/judgments, if any.

The court further noted that the Law on Access to Public Information did not cover requests for information regulated by special laws.

However, she did not submit copies of those letters to the Court. 52.

However, the applicant did not receive a copy of that decision.

    The Government presented extensive handwritten medical notes, which are hardly legible, and a typed synopsis of the applicant's treatment history, on the basis of which they alleged that