CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0924JUD004226506
24 septembre 2019
On 17 May 2006 the Verkh-Isetskiy District Court of Yekaterinburg quashed that decision and ordered a further inquiry. 16.
Page 12 sur 71
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213DEC002551415
13 décembre 2016
The trial at Södertälje District Court ( tingsrätt ) started at the end of 2011 and lasted for approximately six months.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD002788903
20 janvier 2011
By June 2000 the pre-trial investigation was completed and the case was transferred to the Leninsky District Court of Kharkiv (hereinafter “the District Court”). 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000127012
18 juillet 2013
PARNYUK 21/11/1958 Kharkiv 1) Moskovskyy District Court of Kharkiv, 08/08/2011 2) Moskovskyy District Court of Kharkiv, 28/04/2011 3) Moskovskyy District Court of Kharkiv, 26/06/2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0322DEC001776706
22 mars 2016
On 24 June 2003 the applicant challenged the decision of 30 January 2003 before the Smolninskiy District Court, St Petersburg (“the District Court”). 14 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD008339917
28 janvier 2020
On 28 September 2015 the Prikubanskiy District Court in Krasnodar dismissed the Ministry’s claims.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0212JUD007429711
12 février 2015
In February 2011 the case was referred to the Dzerzhynskyy District Court of Kharkiv (“the District Court”) for trial. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0620JUD006565611
20 juin 2013
22/03/2011 2) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Lugansk, 01/04/2011 19562/12 27/03/2012 Mykola Oleksandrovych RAK 26/03/1985 1) Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 10/11/2010 2)
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225691
1 juin 2023
Court of Moscow, Meshchanskiy District Court, Moscow City Court 4 year(s) and 16 day(s) use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice;
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2306167-2468060
26 mars 2008
He was then taken to the Voronezh Leninskiy District Police Station.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD003761904
14 octobre 2010
On 25 and 27 May 1992 respectively, the then Skopje District Commercial Court granted two of the enforcement requests ordering the debtors to pay the debt.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306DEC004498405
6 mars 2012
On 22 October 1996 the applicants instituted proceedings before the Krško District Court requesting the determination of the co-ownership share on a disputed property.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC004517205
6 mars 2007
On 14 February 2005 the applicant lodged complaints with the Kyivsky District Court of Odessa (the “Kyivsky Court”) against the Commissariat, seeking that it recalculate his pension due to changes to the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621DEC006113808
21 juin 2011
On that date, as well as on six later dates, the District Court judge assigned to the case could not be present so the case was adjourned.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0702DEC001093211
2 juillet 2013
On 26 August 2008 the Brno Regional Court nevertheless upheld the judgment agreeing with the District Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0924DEC006819810
24 septembre 2013
The Prague 2 District Court decided on 18 October 2009 not to award the applicant’s client any costs.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329DEC004232614
29 mars 2016
Court on 5 October 2006 (under the file no. 6 Cb 83/2008, and originally before the Trnava District Court under the file no. 9 Cb 86/2006).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211DEC000244615
11 février 2020
Le 11 avril 2014, le tribunal du district Basmanny avait rejeté leur recours. Le 23 juin 2014, la cour de la ville de Moscou confirma cette décision en appel.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015DEC000616105
15 octobre 2013
On 19 December 2002 the Gagarinskyy District Court found in part for the applicants.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0430DEC001226507
30 avril 2013
Stephen Phillips Boštjan M. Zupančič Deputy Registrar President Appendix No.