It was of the view that it was correct and that its conclusion that the injury could not have been caused by the police’s conduct described by the applicant (the officers stepping on his buttocks while

          The applicant had requested the court to call the policeman as a witness.

It pointed out that the proceedings only concerned the police’s decision on non-competence and did not constitute review of the police’s original decision declaring Kossuth Square a “security operational

If      the policeman concentrates on one crime, he may be accused of      neglecting others.

Therefore, the police’s lack of diligence disclosed a breach of the respondent State’s obligation to take all reasonable measures to safeguard the right to life. Conclusion: violation (unanimously).

The Harju Country Court, whose decision was final, upheld the police’s refusal.

The points raised in the judicial-review proceedings – which essentially related to general objections to the police’s statutory power to impose a fine and to the reliability of the speed measurements

Par suite, il y a lieu d'enjoindre au préfet de policede procéder sans délai à cet effacement dès la notification du présent jugement.

  He was then taken to the toilet by a policeman who started insulting him.

The policeman who took the applicant to the toilet started insulting him, using offensive language.

We have however not been able to establish who took the message and, later on, the recording just like other evidence has been removed from the file.’, submits the former policeman who took part in the

On 18 October 2000 the   policeman involved was convicted of injury to health caused by   negligence in the course of duty.

Subsidiairement, elle invoque la faute du notaire, soutenant qu'aucun manquement ne peut être imputé à l'agent immobilier, se prévalant, en tout état de cause de la franchise prévue par sa police.La CEGI

The applicant worked as a policeman after the fall of the Saddam Hussein regime and was taking part in an operation aimed at terrorists and criminals.

The decision stated, in particular, that the applicant had been unable to identify the policeman who had ill-treated him. The applicant claims that the alleged identification had not taken place.

  He maintains that he was barred from examining a very important witness, namely the policeman who had drafted the report of 17 March 1986.

At the police's request, they produced their identity cards and the registration card of the car, whose owner was asleep in the house.

The applicant argued that he had exhausted domestic remedies by filing a request for the judicial review of the police’s non-competence decision. 16.

regarding privileged materials, no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s