Before the European Court, the applicants complained that the Military Administrative High Court lacked independence and impartiality because the bench included career army officers.

On appeal, the case was assigned to Dr M.’s bench at the Fejér County Regional Court. The applicant learned about this assignment when receiving a summons on 17 September 2009.

est ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 5 novembre 1998 par la cour d'appel de Versailles (12e chambre civile, 1re section), au profit : 1 / de M.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par M.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par : 1 / la Banque pour l'industrie française "BIF

  304/2004), as in force at the material time, reads as follows: Section 54(2) “Appeals shall be examined by benches of two judges, and appeals on points of law by benches of three judges.”

DBY2-W-B7J-IBIL JUGEMENT du 24 Novembre 2025 Minute n°79/2025 [I] [L] C/ [V] [X] PROCÉDURES CIVILES D’EXÉCUTION JUGEMENT ____________________________________________________________ Rendu

BEACH, la S.A.R.L. LES JASMINS et la S.A.R.L.

COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS 15è chambre, section C ARRET DU 9 JUIN 2000 (N , pages) Numéro d'inscription au répertoire général : 1999/09102 Pas de jonction Décision dont appel : Jugement rendu le 10/03/1999

access to the beach and the sea.

[Y] [F] demande à la cour de : - confirmer le jugement rendu le 8 Mars 2011 rendu par le tribunal de grande instance de Grasse, et y ajoutant, - accueillir M.

By a judgment of 8 November 2001, the Criminal Bench of the Supreme Court, composed of one professional judge and two lay judges ( msajuli ), found Mr Panjikidze, Mr Kurashvili and Mr Kantaria guilty of

The case was assigned to a bench of judges presided over by M.P. (see paragraph 4 above). 9 .

Domestic courts’ practice concerning proceedings in absentia In its unifying decision no. 2 of 14 October 2002 the Supreme Court Joint Benches ruled that, having regard to its strictly personal character

  As regards application no. 44673/07   Having regard to the participation of Judges S. S., Xh. Z. and P.

___________________________________ AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS _________________________ LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, a rendu

une terrasse qui constitue également la toiture de l’immeuble Le Carlton Beach.

    Judge A.H., who had been a member of the District Court’s bench that had delivered the judgment of 26 December 2000, also sat in the District Court’s bench of 4 November 2005 that dismissed

Zena Poulli, (2001) 3 C.L.R 1060 , the Supreme Court, sitting as a full bench, on 19   November 2001 granted an application to set aside an appeal judgment of the Supreme Court delivered by a bench