Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

    Pre-trial criminal proceedings 5.

    The Court reiterates that execution of a court judgment is regarded as an integral part of the “trial” under Article 6 of the Convention (see Hornsby v.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

submitted that the applicant had not exhausted domestic remedies since she had not availed herself of the complaint provided for by the Law of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial

Having regard to the total length of the proceedings before the trial court in the present case, the Court is not convinced that these proceedings were conducted within a reasonable time.

    The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he had been denied a fair trial by an independent and impartial tribunal on account of the composition of the Supreme Military

As to the Government's contention that the applicant failed to comply with the six months time-limit, the Court recalls that, in assessing whether or not a trial was fair, regard should be had to the entirety

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

According to this decision the court found that the applicant's guilt had been duly established during the trial in the first-instance court.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

applicant raised complaints about the fairness of the proceedings and alleged that two witnesses, whose evidence had been used for his arrest and subsequent conviction, were not summoned before the trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial