CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0506JUD000865879
6 mai 1985
   In addition, as the applicant experienced in his case, there was little opportunity for the defence to obtain the appointment of a counter-expert (see paragraphs 11, 14, 16 and 18 above).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0319JUD005644311
19 mars 2019
to education is fundamental; Considering the importance of education in the development of the individual and the community; Realising in particular that a high proportion of prisoners have had very little
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0407JUD002285309
7 avril 2015
The case-file itself provides little clarification, with reference being made to a delay in the preparation of a prison report (see paragraph   30 above).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0318DEC005334908
18 mars 2010
On 26 September 2007 the High Court rejected the request for a reconstruction of the alleged hanging incidents on the ground that such a reconstruction was assumed to have little evidentiary significance
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1001DEC002310907
1 octobre 2009
A little corner of the tooth had broken off and this the applicant had incidentally mentioned to S.M.L. once he met her in the local grocery. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103JUD005767510
3 novembre 2015
    The Court further observes that there is little scope under Article   10   § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or on debate concerning questions of public
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0510DEC001935402
10 mai 2005
In so doing, it may well be that she would have provided valuable corroboration for the other little girl, [ED], and it may be that that would then have provided the jury with testimony that would have
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD001500702
7 décembre 2006
Furthermore, the failure of the authorities, following years of investigation, to produce to the court a case ready for trial reveals little diligence on their part.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1016DEC000240405
16 octobre 2006
The parents had been good at keeping the appointments, and although the father had only little contact with C, the mother was very preoccupied with proving that she could perform the role as a mother.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0921JUD003224096
21 septembre 2000
  The file contains little evidence that the establishment and operation of a cable network lays a disproportionate onus on the broadcaster, or that a link-up with, and subscription to, cable broadcasting
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207394
11 décembre 2020
However, Dr P.K. noted that the applicant demonstrated little insight into and acceptation of his mental illness and lacked remorse for the offence he had committed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:1023JUD000884880
23 octobre 1985
Accordingly, "the character of the legislation which governs how the matter is to be determined ... and that of the authority which is invested with jurisdiction in the matter ... are ... of little consequence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609DEC007443514
9 juin 2020
    On the same day, a little before midnight, police forces entered the premises of ERT and interrupted the transmission of its programmes.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1007DEC007761701
7 octobre 2004
However, little has been done to investigate this case and measures that have been taken were inadequate and ineffective.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC007494610
13 mai 2014
    The applicants further submitted that even if the second applicant had been joined in the possession proceedings, there was very little that they could have done to avoid eviction. 48.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302JUD001188605
2 mars 2006
I have little doubt that the case is admissible. Indeed, it meets the admissibility criteria of Article 35 § 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707DEC003032013
7 juillet 2020
above), where the Court found that the noise to which the applicants had been exposed for a number of years had by far overstepped the statutory thresholds and where the competent authorities had taken little
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0119JUD002044011
19 janvier 2017
    On 18 December 2011, a little over a year after the final judgment of the Supreme Court of Cassation on the issue of the child’s travel, the first applicant and her partner, who was still
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0509JUD003412996
9 mai 2000
The majority of the Court attach little weight to the letter signed by each member of the jury, or to the judge's redirection of the jury on two occasions or to the fact that the judge had direct contact
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917DEC005775017
17 septembre 2019
Furthermore, regard must be had to the fact that the son lived together with the applicant in Sweden only for a period of little more than a year, until the autumn of 2016.
Page 120 sur 182