The applicants received very little substantive information from official bodies about the investigation into the disappearances.

    When adjudicating on disappearance cases in Chechnya, the Court has borne in mind the difficulties associated with obtaining evidence and the fact that, often, little evidence can be submitted

The Court reiterates that there is little scope under Article   10 §   2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or debates on questions of public interest.

real risk of being treated in a manner contrary to the provisions of Article 3 of the Convention, the following factors were taken into account: -     All young Tamils in Colombo who speak little

The space free of furniture was little more than 1   sq. m. per person, since the applicant was detained in the cell with three other men.

  It mattered little in this respect that section   III of the third amended version of the Motor Vehicles Act, which was applied in the present case, had been enacted after the reservation had

    As to the period prior to 1 January 2000, the interference had lasted a little over four years, which does not appear to have been an unreasonable length of time given that the tractor had

    The Court reiterates that there is little scope under Article   10 §   2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or debates on questions of public interest (see Sürek

He knew little about it One member of Jörg Haider’s former chicken coop (if this casual expression is permitted) who is still in office took his turn in the witness box yesterday: Ewald Stadler, now a

    The Court notes that taken separately, the first set of civil proceedings which began in 1990 lasted a little less than five years at three court levels, which might be acceptable in the

At the other meals, detainees only received bread and a little cheese or halva. Meat and fruit were rarely included on the menu.

The relatives received very little substantive information in reply. On several occasions they received copies of letters by which their complaints were forwarded to other authorities.

Second, the search had to be carried out in an effective and secure way, in addition to causing as little harm as possible.

The Court recalls that there is little scope under Article   10 §   2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or on debate on questions of public interest (see Sürek v.

independent body had recommended a review after 12 months and the Secretary of State’s reasons for departing therefrom were unconvincing: the nature of his index offences and prison history were of little

In their decisions, the domestic courts devoted little or no consideration to these arguments, apparently treating them as irrelevant to the question of the lawfulness of the applicant’s pre ‑ trial

Notwithstanding the conclusions in Öcalan , it seems to me (and it is for this reason that I voted with the majority) that the Section is entitled to go a little further on the basis of the Grand Chamber's

There is therefore little doubt that their addition to the criminal file strengthened the case for the prosecution, especially as their author's status lent them undeniable authority.

As little progress had been made, the applicant, who was still receiving advice from solicitors, made a further application ex parte to the High Court.

  Apparently the Court felt that this went a little too far and that there was a need for some restriction allowing for a certain measure of control by the Convention institutions.