In the case of Petimat Ismailova and Others v.

His report contained the following remarks: “... according to the record of the initial medical examination carried out by the IVS of ORB-2, the examinations conducted on 7 March, 17 March, 29 March, 10

A few days later, on 26 March 2020, one of the lawyers working with Mr P.P. had called the applicant’s father and asked him to go again to the Specialised Prosecutor’s Office and get the remaining gold

In the case of Pieniak v.

In March 2003 the case was still pending before the City Court. 2.

somme de 54 776 760 francs CFP à titre de dommages-intérêts ; "aux motifs qu'elle a prétendu et continue de prétendre tout ignorer de la provenance frauduleuse des fonds versés sur son compte par son mari

  The applicants   The case concerns an application (no. 44568/98) brought by 2 French nationals, Mr R.L. and Ms M.

Serbia , 41698/06, 21   March 2017.]

The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.     Investigation 3.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant company, may be summarised as follows. The applicant company is the successor of a former State-owned enterprise.

Since March 2022 the town of Volnovakha, where the investigation was being carried out, has been occupied by Russian troops.

They also contend that no effective investigation was carried out. Lastly, the applicants allege that the circumstances of the case disclose violations of Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention.

  Greece , no. 35322/12, §§ 43-56, 26 March 2020)?   In particular, having regard to sections 5 and 46 of Law no.

  Vinogradov; the parties’ observations, Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT-MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

In March 2012 the doctors performed a nephrostomy (a procedure to drain the urine) and made a follow-up appointment for two months later.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

183 March 2015 Varga and Others v.