In the leading case of Dirdizov v.   Russia, no.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, (no. 41984/98, 9   November 2004), and Efimenko v.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    In the leading case of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006; for more recent case-law see Beketov v. Ukraine [Committee], no.

    In the leading case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no.

Despite making several attempts and leaving messages, however, he could not reach him. 8.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no.

    In the leading case of Iacov Stanciu v. Romania, no. 35972/05, 24   July 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Obluk v. Slovakia (no. 69484/01, 20 September 2006), the Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 23.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v.

    In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v.

    In the leading case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos.

    Leaving aside the question whether the respondent State can be held responsible for every delay in the proceedings, it is to be noted that, as admitted by the Government (see paragraph 30

    In the leading cases of Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 22 May 2012; Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, §§ 246-48, 31 May 2011; and Lebedev v.

    The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points

    In the leading cases of Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012 and Butko v.

    In this regard, it observes that in its decision of 18 August 2010, the Sverdlovskiy Regional Court assessed the applicant’s participation in the events leading to the charge under Article