CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0211DEC000603519
11 février 2025
In the case the national courts accepted the applicant’s appeal against the disciplinary punishment and examined the subject matter of the case. 21.
Page 125 sur 819
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1003DEC002078614
3 octobre 2024
Having been officially indicted on 9 March 2009, the applicant pleaded not guilty at the ensuing trial. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1116DEC005784115
16 novembre 2023
There is no information as to whether any construction work was carried out during that period. 7.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0321JUD002717821
21 mars 2024
In the case of Kadzanaia v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177187
28 août 2017
The MRI scan and examination by a neurosurgeon on 16 March 2015 and the CT test carried out in May 2015 resulted in the determination of the type and scope of the applicant’s discal hernia.
ECLI:CEDH:001-115999
18 décembre 2012
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55589
6 janvier 1994
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"), Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Vermeire case
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2160131-2295328
8 novembre 2007
The case mainly concerned his detention conditions.
ECLI:CEDH:001-173019
20 mars 2017
On 2 March 2017 the applicant’s lawyer filed her observations in reply.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707DEC000044912
7 juillet 2020
The circumstances of the case 3. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.
cr
6079a8d29ba5988459c4f088
4 février 2004
en scène Joseph X... avec des jeunes filles vraisemblablement mineures : * cassette intitulée "Asia Dream" n° 1 et 2, * cassettes portant les inscriptions "May 1 fois/Ni/Koukik//Louim, * cassette
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD003752216
14 novembre 2023
In the case of Vukušić v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:1210JUD000830478
10 décembre 1982
The investigating judge issued an order discharging the applicant which was filed at the registry on 2 March; on 13 March 1978, the case-file was sent to the public prosecutor’s office.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC002625807
17 novembre 2009
The Magistrates’ Court (in its case stated to the High Court in the first applicant’s case) noted police evidence to the effect that, had authorisation been sought, no conditions would have attached to
civ3
61372123cd580146773f1488
20 décembre 1989
rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par l'Association Syndicale Libre des Propriétaires des SABLES D'OR LES PINS, dont le siège social est ... (16ème), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 23 mars
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0108DEC003077714
8 janvier 2019
The circumstances of the case 3. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4. In 1997 the applicant married P.I.N.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0717JUD000658707
17 juillet 2018
In the case of Fefilov v.
ECLI:CEDH:003-68397-68865
4 mai 2001
In all four cases, regarding the applicants’ complaints concerning the investigation into the death carried out by the authorities, these had been examined above under the procedural aspect of Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0713JUD006125708
13 juillet 2017
In the case of Ozols v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217DEC001026013
17 février 2015