out on the basis of the Supreme Court’s new case-law.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Sobczak, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

On 19 March 2022, after the beginning of the Russian Federation’s large-scale invasion of Ukraine, the public prosecutor of the Podilsk Local Prosecutor’s office in Kyiv informed the detention facility

  Summary of the facts   Before October 1993 the noise caused by night flying at Heathrow had been controlled through restrictions on the total number of take-offs and landings.

The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 3.

The original criminal case no. 76586, which still carried the charges under Articles 28/220.1 and 179.3.2, was not taken to trial, but was not terminated either.

  [1] Under Article 43 of the Convention, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑

That finding had been rejected by the Timişoara military tribunal, which asked for additional investigative steps to be taken, but in spite of that no further enquiries had been carried out and the case

It referred the case to the Court on 6 March 1999.

The facts of the case pointed to an exceptional situation rather than a routine case of negligence.

Lastly, the prison authorities could impede the judge’s power to issue orders by referring to the scale of the work to be carried out or the cost.

Between July 2016 and April 2017 the authorities, having carried out a preliminary inquiry into the matter, repeatedly refused to open a criminal case for the lack of corpus   delicti .

  23126/16, § 55, 1 March 2022. 12.     The Court further notes that the present case is similar to the case of Alexandru-Radu Luca v.

In this connection, in the case of Aliyev v.

and   DECIDES to close the examination of this case.

In this connection, as regards application no. 19557/15, was the applicant’s detention ordered by former Ukrainian judges who, prior to March 2014, had carried out their tasks in Crimea according to Ukrainian