CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

1 111 résultats pour « AMIGUES Me HAAS »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0825DEC002369502

Admin. suprême

25 août 2005

25 août 2005

He had previously been imprisoned on a warrant for his arrest after he had failed to attend a hearing, and he had also been imprisoned for two weeks for failing to co-operate with the trustee.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0117DEC002975496

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 1997

17 janvier 1997

  The plaintiff alleged that the first applicant had falsely told him that she had separated from her husband and had introduced the second applicant as her cousin; she had claimed to be wealthy and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0904DEC003090096

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 1996

4 septembre 1996

review of administrative organs' decisions which had become final prior to 1 January 1992, i.e. the date when the administrative judiciary had been established.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521DEC002820995

Admin. suprême

21 mai 1997

21 mai 1997

However, the new counsel was later appointed as a District Court judge and the applicant had to change advocate.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC003200996

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 1996

16 octobre 1996

VILA AMIGÓ              Mrs.   M.F.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0910DEC003723197

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 1998

10 septembre 1998

VILA AMIGÓ     Mrs   M. HION     Mr   R. NICOLINI       Mrs   M.F.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC003283196

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 1996

16 octobre 1996

  It found that the applicant had no capacity to take the said proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0417DEC002564794

Admin. suprême

17 avril 1997

17 avril 1997

He had failed to voice his disagreement earlier because he had been originally advised by his solicitors to wait. Subsequently he was involved in another trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002701495

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 1997

2 juillet 1997

        In reply to a complaint that the administrative authority had failed to establish who had tipped certain types of waste and when, the Administrative Court replied

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002610095

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 1996

16 octobre 1996

The applicant had then threatened to leave her. Thereupon, on 20 April 1982, the applicant's companion had signed the declaration which had been prepared by the applicant's counsel.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0227DEC002395794

Admin. suprême

27 février 1997

27 février 1997

       On 19 May 1987 the expert R. reported to the Regional Court that friendly settlement discussions had been taken up and had been adjourned pending submission of further documents

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002772395

Admin. suprême

9 avril 1997

9 avril 1997

The judge instructed that all individual claims had to be notified to Glaxo by 1 February 1993 and that the court proceedings had to be served by 1 March 1994.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1020DEC003100796

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 1997

20 octobre 1997

On 12 October 1993 the Federal Ministry for the Interior (Bundesministerium für Inneres) dismissed his appeal, in which he had submitted inter alia that an attempt to serve a call-up order on him had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002755495

Admin. suprême

9 avril 1997

9 avril 1997

The judge instructed that all individual claims had to be notified to Glaxo by 1 February 1993 and that the court proceedings had to be served by 1 March 1994.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0528REP002935795

Admin. suprême

28 mai 1998

28 mai 1998

The first co-accused, living in Munich, had operated as courier, the two further co-accused had been secret agents of the secret service of the former German Democratic Republic and had also been living

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1203DEC003266996

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 1997

3 décembre 1997

The applicant has indicated that from that date Mrs. P. and Mr. V. ceased living together and had no further relationship of any kind.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0225DEC003312496

Admin. suprême

25 février 1997

25 février 1997

which he had been questioned and ill-treated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0120DEC002660195

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 1997

20 janvier 1997

Other colleagues had hinted to him that judge L. had said in the canteen that he, the applicant, had been bribed, because he insisted on this search.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC002677895

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 1998

14 janvier 1998

It found that the two psychiatric experts had contradicted each other. While Dr. Q. had found that the applicant no longer presented a danger, Dr. Kr. had come to the opposite conclusion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0518DEC003555797

Admin. suprême

18 mai 1998

18 mai 1998

Furthermore, the father had not had any employment in Sweden.

Source officielle

Page 13 sur 56

← PrécédentSuivant →