The applicants and their families then moved to Diyarbakır where they currently live.

According to the husband they had then travelled on to the Netherlands by taxi, whereas the wife stated that they had also travelled by train on this part of their journey.

latter's community in the village that they would protect them.

They denied the charges against them and stated that the arresting officers had beaten them and then driven them to the T.

The male members of the family were taken into the courtyard where they were ordered to take off their shirts and were body searched. The military also searched the household.

Although they had been granted Government-funded legal aid, this would not result in any compensation being paid to them if there was a right to reimbursement of these costs by either the opposing or a

    Summary of the judgment [2]   Complaints The applicants complained that the local authority failed to protect them from the abuse they suffered as children and that they had neither

During the funeral, they shot in our direction with machine guns. They shot towards all of us. Then they said that there had been guerrillas on motorcycles at the funeral.

They claim that they were slandered by drug addicts and avenged by the regional prosecutor's office for a drug-related arrest of the prosecutor's son in the past...

Then they took Valid and Aslan Dzhabrailov's passports, beat them, dragged them outside and forced them to the ground.

There are exceptions to this principle, but they must not infringe the rights of the defence.

According to the applicants, there were no beds there and when they asked whether they would sleep there, they were told that they would be taken elsewhere.

Then I went out and saw two cars near the house. The servicemen told that they had seized those cars. I cannot tell who ordered them to seize the cars. I did not give such an order.

land belonging to them rather than the actual benefit that they would derive from these works.

She had then hidden in the flat with her son. After her husband had been hit, the officers had continued firing into the flat. The officers had not informed them that they were police officers.

    The applicants submitted that, if the settlements their fellow officers reached had applied to them, they too would have been re-evaluated for the years 2002-2004.

They work in the company of prisoners from H1 and H2 and all prisoners take visits in the common visits area.   There is no indication of any tension in these areas.

The applicants stated that they did not know these persons, and that they did not accept the parts of the statements that were against them.

; to establish their place of residence and to summon them to the prosecutor’s office for the purpose of granting them victim status in the criminal case. 8 .

  They forcefully took the first applicant and his father into a police car and brought them to the police station.   There they were detained for about two hours and then released.