that part of Nigeria (they attach a press communiqué of the Nigerian news agency as evidence of the massacres committed there in that respect) and because their uncle would be the chieftain of the rebels

l'intervention poursuivie que les propos ont été tenus à l'occasion de la critique des derniers ouvrages publiés au cours de l'émission "On efface tout et on recommence" ; que c'est à propos des thèses

C... et D..., ne croient pas à cette thèse, M.

selon laquelle le non-paiement des heures supplémentaires résultait de l'absence pour congés payés pour la période du 20 avril 1990 au 2 mai 1990 et qu'il proposait une nouvelle réunion du personnel, thèse

At 2 p.m., they were placed in administrative detention in a police station. Their father came to meet them there but was not allowed to see them.

The latter started to shout abuse at the eleven shepherds, hitting them with their rifle butts, kicking them and slapping them on the face. They separated the women from the men.

Intelligence online a reconstitué le réseau d'experts auto-proclamés à l'origine d'une campagne médiatique pour promouvoir une théorie du complot sur le 11 septembre.

  The policemen made the applicant take off his shoes, started stamping on his toes, crushing and bleeding them, and then extinguished their burning cigarettes on them.

They stated that the polythene sheet had been planted there by the police after they had been brought to the police station.

The children had been exposed to patterns of violence and there were chronic shortcomings in the care given to them in their home.

They complain, in particular, that the hearing was not open to the public, and that their right to defence was violated and that they were not given adequate time to prepare their defence.

After the search the first and third applicants were taken by the police to the local administration where they were questioned separately for about one hour. Then they returned home.

The policemen then pulled the applicant by the handcuffs, released them and pushed him into a dry riverbed and trained their guns at him.

They complained that their rights guaranteed under Article 6 of the Convention were violated since they had been forcibly evicted from their village by the security forces The applicants contended under

Code pénal, 575-6 , 591 et 593 du Code de procédure pénale ; "en ce que l'arrêt a dit n'y avoir lieu à suivre contre quiconque du chef de faux en écritures privées commis au préjudice de la société THEG

  They then argued inter alia that as members of the group of Roma they risked persecution in Yugoslavia.

They had reported the persecution to the police who had refused to help them. On 3 August 2007 the Migration Board rejected the requests.

They argue, under Article 5 § 2 of the Convention, that they were not informed promptly of the reasons for their arrest or of the charges against them.

They had not been detained there and had left of their own free will.

In their pleadings before the Commission they described these grounds as follows: "There had been a complex and lengthy investigation, and the public were entitled to learn the result of that investigation