Kalmykov’s bank account, as indicated by the applicant (see, for example, Belousov v.   Ukraine , no.

Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 53-56, 28   November 2017; Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia , nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§ 145-154, 4   October 2016; and Fortalnov and Others v. Russia , nos.

11, 27   November 2012, as regards lengthy and unjustified pre-trial detention;   Idalov , cited above, §§   154 ‑ 58, as regards lengthy review of detention matters; Yaroslav Belousov

44879/07 ZHIRNOV NIKOLAY BORISOVICH 1963 982           55317/07 KOZIY GEORGIY YURYEVICH 1951 923           55331/07 BELOUSOV

    The relevant provisions of the Constitution and the Code of Criminal Procedure, as worded at the material time, can be found in Belousov v.

with the issue of the use of glass cabins in courtrooms and found that under certain circumstances such a practice could also disclose a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (see Yaroslav   Belousov

  33627/06, §§   74-78, 15   November   2012; and Belousov v. Ukraine , no.

  33627/06, §§   74-78, judgment of 15   November   2012 ); and Belousov (cited above, §   85); and (b)     a violation of Article 6   §   1 of the Convention

therefore apply to all gatherings except to those where the organisers and participants have the intention to incite violence or otherwise reject the foundations of a democratic society (see Yaroslav Belousov

Ignatov’s bank account, as indicated by the applicants (see, for example, Belousov v.   Ukraine , no.

He was therefore deprived of his liberty within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (compare Belousov v.   Ukraine, no. 4494/07, § 83, 7 November 2013; Kortesis v. Greece , no.

    Having regard to the fact that the applicants are under a contractual obligation to pay their lawyer (see Belousov v.

de la société Micro-Brasserie Malterie Chaumontoise (Eurl Biodiffusion), la société Ghid [X] Srl et la société Axa France Iard à lui verser ès qualité de mandataire judiciaire de la Sarl Brasserie Belolouff

availability of any other domestic remedy (such as a civil or administrative action), it must consider that the applicant exhausted the remedies available to him in respect of his complaint (see, similarly, Belousov

Moreover, the applicant’s ill ‑ treatment was intentional and was aimed at extracting evidence from him in relation to the crime of which he was suspected (see, similarly, Belousov v.

Russia, no. 39708/07, §§ 13-14 and 54, 28 November 2017, Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia , nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§ 145-54, 4   October 2016, Fortalnov and Others v.

Russia (no. 74568/12, §§   7-65, 5   January 2016) and Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia (nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§ 7-33, 4 October 2016). 5.

criticising the decision to reject his request to appear outside the glass dock, he referred to the Public Defenders’ Office’s decision of 17 April 2018 (see paragraph 19 below), and also to Yaroslav Belousov

no. 38971/06, 25   October 2007, related to the lack of an enforceable right to compensation for detention which has been found to be in violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention; Yaroslav Belousov

  11901/02, §   47, 29   June 2006 as regards the applicability of Article   8 to searches of non-residential premises and, mutatis mutandis , Belousov v. Ukraine , no.