CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

295 résultats pour « Clotilde LAMY Me »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD000858908

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2014

10 juillet 2014

Khrunova, a lawyer practising in Kazan. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.

Source officielle

Page 13 sur 15

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD001826918

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2023

28 novembre 2023

Dobreva, a lawyer practising in Sofia. 3.     The Government were represented by their Agents, Ms I. Nedyalkova and Ms S. Sobadzhieva, of the Ministry of Justice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0410JUD002612995

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2001

10 avril 2001

Blood clotting was observed inside the blood vessels in the front section and clotted blood was detected inside heart. Black pigmented specks were found in the lungs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416DEC002742595

Admin. suprême

16 avril 1998

16 avril 1998

Reiser, a lawyer practising in Regensburg.        The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.   A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0925JUD002317894

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 1997

25 septembre 1997

The Government’s observations were communicated to the applicant’s lawyers in a letter dated 23   November 1996. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0912JUD004682009

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2017

12 septembre 2017

    The applicants, who had been granted legal aid, were represented by Mr   Hüseyin Aygün and Mr Cihan Söylemez, lawyers practising in Tunceli.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0214JUD001760515

Admin. suprême

14 février 2017

14 février 2017

Her lawyer called M.N. and informed him of the situation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0325DEC004041007

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2025

25 mars 2025

Savić, a lawyer practising in Belgrade.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD004856206

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2012

27 novembre 2012

Yefremova, a lawyer practising in Moscow. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0115JUD002769995

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2004

15 janvier 2004

When the firing stopped, plain-clothed policemen arrived on the scene. They took A.T. into a nearby building and a few minutes later took him away in a white minibus.

Source officielle
CA

17e chambre

5fca9f2c43dfd19523e5aef3

Appel

8 juillet 2020

8 juillet 2020

vestiaire : C0184 INTIME **************** Composition de la cour : L'affaire a été fixée à l'audience publique du 7 mai 2020 pour être débattue devant la cour composée de: Madame Clotilde

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD000179907

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2016

5 juillet 2016

Zakrzewska, a lawyer practising in Radomsko. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz, succeeded by Ms   J.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0331JUD001802091

Admin. suprême

31 mars 1992

31 mars 1992

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para. 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and designated the lawyers who would represent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD005216013

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2016

12 janvier 2016

  Camilleri, lawyers practising in Valletta. The Maltese Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Dr P. Grech, Attorney General. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0512JUD006223509

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2016

12 mai 2016

    The applicant was represented before the Court by lawyers of the EHRAC/Memorial Human Rights Centre, NGOs with offices in Moscow and London.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187544

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2018

9 octobre 2018

regard to the use of the applicant’s “statement of surrender and confession” ( явка с повинной ), which was allegedly obtained as a result of his ill-treatment by the police and in the absence of a lawyer

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0430DEC004583799

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2002

30 avril 2002

The applicants are represented before the Court by Mr   Knut Rognlien, a lawyer practising in Oslo. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD003520806

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2010

13 juillet 2010

Toma, a lawyer practising in Chişinău. The Moldovan Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V. Grosu. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210388

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2021

11 mai 2021

Dobreva, a lawyer practising in Sofia. 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant and emerging from the documents submitted by her, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0606JUD003413096

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2000

6 juin 2000

In his pleadings at the hearing, the applicant's lawyer said that since a recovery plan had been put before the court, section 61 of the Law of 25   January 1985 was applicable. 24.

Source officielle