For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declarations and of the arrangements for ensuring compliance with the

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declarations and of the arrangements for ensuring compliance with the

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declarations and of the arrangements for ensuring compliance with the

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declarations and of the arrangements for ensuring compliance with the

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declarations and of the arrangements for ensuring compliance with the

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications admissible; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article   5   §   3

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to join them. 21.

      Application No. 24521/94                       by Sammy Martin DAVIS

Accordingly, it decides to join its examination to the merits of the case. 22.

and five other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 2   April 2013 as a Chamber composed of:   Ineta Ziemele, President,   David

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications admissible; Holds that the applications disclose a breach of Article   5   §   3 of

    Principal facts   There were 11 individual applicants: David Wilson, a journalist working on the Daily Mail and employed by the British newspaper publishing company Associated Newspapers

Morrison, Mr David J. Mann and Mr Ian P. Northwood, respectively on 26 September 2000, 28 September 2000 and 29 September 2000 in the case of the last three applicants. 2.

}   FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application nos. 65202/01, 73653/01, 27959/02, 28023/02, 28062/02, 28074/02, 28078/02, 42699/02, 4810/02, 23244/03, 23816/03 and 345/04 by David

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 29 January 2026.

N° Portalis DBWQ-W-B7J-QPDV Après débats à l'audience publique tenue le 25 Mars 2026 Nous, Madame Stéphanie LE GALL, Vice-Présidente du tribunal judiciaire de GRASSE, assistée de Madame Florine JOBIN

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,      Decides to join the applications;      Declares the applications admissible;      Holds that

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Rejects the Government’s request to strike the applications out of the list; Declares the applications admissible; Holds that

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Rejects the Government’s request to strike the applications out of the list on the basis of their unilateral declarations; Declares