He concluded that it was “clear from his demeanour on the screen and during the course of his bail application that it would be entirely inappropriate to release the applicant on bail...”. 8.

However, as established above, it is clear from the circumstances of the present case that M.J.’s mental state had never suggested that such special protective measures were necessary (see, mutatis mutandis

  Belgium , judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235 ‑ B, pp. 32-33, §   32; Edwards v. the United Kingdom , judgment of 16 December 1992, Series   A no.

The Insurance Court finds an oral hearing in this matter unnecessary as the matter is considered to be clear.”

they argue that the death had resulted from the inaction of the authorities in the face of a real and immediate risk to the life of A.B.U. which they knew or ought to have known (see Paul and Audrey Edwards

The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the inadequate conditions of detention (see, for example, Ananyev and Others v.

applicant’s co-accused] in the first place but also [the applicant] knew that the girls, all of whom were not yet identified, were involved in prostitution, both in the Czech Republic and abroad, and it is clear

When it was clear to them that their efforts remained without effect, they decided to file an application with the European Commission of Human Rights.

telle sorte qu'il était impossible que Monsieur [R] [E] réalise, en moyenne, 49 heures de travail par semaine, - le salarié ne lui a pas restitué le carnet de suivi des travaux de broyage, et les clefs

At bail hearings on 10 May 2013 and 20 May 2013, Mr Othman informed SIAC through his Leading Counsel, Edward Fitzgerald QC, that, were the Treaty to come into force, Mr Othman would return voluntarily

Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a British national, Mr St John Edward

Belgium , 22   April 1992, Series   A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 32, and Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, §   34).

:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 53490/99 by Edward

inline-block } .sAE540E25 { width:21.87pt; display:inline-block } .s7DF13505 { width:188.79pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 43425/98 by Edward

Article 285 of the Code provides that, if the expert report is sufficiently clear and comprehensive, it is read at the court hearing without the expert being present.

29 May 2008 requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases and the applicant's reply to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Edward

précisé «merci de ne remettre les clés à personne d'autre (mot manquant) la famille».

Am I making myself clear? THE DEFENDANT COGHLAN: Right. ... MR H: Your honour I think now that that’s been made clear to Mr. Coghlan, we’re in a position to continue. JUDGE O: Yes.

/04) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian national, Mr Eduard