The relevant part of the declaration provided that the Government of Croatia: “(a) acknowledges that in the instant case there has been a violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trail

Section 2 “The Republic of Croatia shall be liable for the damage referred to in section 1 of this Act ...”

Croatia (dec.), no. 44252/10, 2 October 2012; Bogdanović v. Croatia (dec.), no. 72254/11, 18 March 2014; Orić v.   Croatia (dec.), no. 50203/12, 13 May 2014; B. and Others v. Croatia , no.

Croatia , no.   71615/01, § 27, 15 July 2005).

On 14 January 1992 the applicants’ summer house in Gornje Plavnice, Croatia was mined by an unknown perpetrator.

So far the Croatian authorities have not enacted any new legislation regulating the matter. After that the Republic of Croatia appealed against the first instance judgment.

In 1991 the armed conflict escalated in Croatia.

The applicant then applied for a proportional part of the disability pension in Croatia. He relied on a social security agreement between Croatia and the Federal Republic of Germany.

    On 12 April 2013 the company brought the yacht to Croatia.

Croatia , no. 35298/04, 11 June 2009)?   2.

Croatia , no. 51198/08, 25 April 2013; Ömer Güner v. Turkey , no. 28338/07, 4 September 2018; and compare Dominka v. Slovakia , (dec.) no. 14630/12, §§ 28-36, 3 April 2018).

.s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 14 April 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 20441/24 Darko BEŠTEK against Croatia

In particular, in the circumstances of the present case, did that measure strike the requisite fair balance between the demands of the general interest and the requirements of the protection of the applicant

The Constitutional Court further found a breach of the applicant’s right to a fair trial on account of the fact that the prosecution’s reasoned reply to the applicant’s appeal against the first-instance

PROCEEDINGS in croatia Proceedings for the return of the children 17 .

Croatia (no. 24661/02) The applicant, Vinko Buj, is a Croatian national who was born in 1938 and lives in Jelsa (Croatia).

    On 12 May 1998 the Constitutional Court ( Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske ) found that pension instalments of pension beneficiaries in the Republic of Croatia had to be adjusted. 4.

On 12 May 1998 the Constitutional Court ( Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske ) found that pension instalments of pension beneficiaries in the Republic of Croatia had to be adjusted.

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the applicants have a fair hearing before the Court of Appeal in Novi Sad, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

Croatia , no.   44691/14, §§ 56-65, 16 December 2021)?   2.