DBYH-W-B7H-LGDD N° : NC/BM Copie exécutoire : Copie : Délivrée à : Maître Romain JAY de la SELARL CDMF AVOCATS Maître David ROGUET de la SELARL GUMUSCHIAN ROGUET BONZY POLZELLA

xa0; On 4   April   and 3   June   2011 the Iziaslav District Court and the Khmelnytskyi Regional Court of Appeal respectively decided that the question of the lawfulness of the police’s

One of the stones hit a policeman who was wounded on the temple of the head and fell on the ground bleeding profusely.

The bodies were brought to the mosque of the village of Berket-Yurt and the local policeman informed the policeman in Chechen-Aul and the relatives of the missing persons.

Similar recommendation letters were issued to him by the imam of the village mosque in Chechen-Aul and the local policeman. 29.

[M] [U] [Adresse 2] représenté par Me Anne POLICELLA, avocat au barreau de LILLE INTIMÉE : S.A.S.

COMPLAINT The applicants complain that the police’s intervention amounted to an unjustified interference with their Article 10 rights, in view of the Vajnai   v.

, au motif d'une irrégularité affectantles conditions desa garde à vue, et a ordonné en conséquence sa mise en liberté,sans statuersurle fond de la demande de prolongationprésenté par le préfet de policede

search: applicant not a suspect, no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s

Through a Spanish newspaper ( El Mundo ) he became aware that on 26 October 2017 the National Police Force ( Policía Nacional ) had seized documents concerning investigations carried out by the Mossos

The police’s interest in the applicant attracted considerable media attention and several newspapers reported on his interrogation and criminal past, but did not disclose his identity.

    On 19 January 2009 the Inspectorate informed a police precinct ( Valsts policijas Rīgas reģiona pārvaldes Rīgas zemgales iecirknis ) about the situation.

Then the other policeman, D.B., used pepper spray which he directed in the applicant’s face. When the applicant calmed down, he was handcuffed.

On 2 October 2013 the Internal Security Bureau of the State Police ( Valsts policijas Iekšējās drošības birojs ) examined the applicant’s request and replied that no ancillary decision under the section

On 4 November 1997 the applicant entered the State service as a policeman in Vukovar.

If the policeman concentrates on one crime, he may be accused of neglecting others.

applicant’s plea of entrapment to be addressed effectively, the domestic courts would have had to establish in adversarial proceedings the reasons why the operation had been mounted, the extent of the police’s

According to the applicant, he requested several times during the trial and re-trial to summon certain witnesses (in particular, C., the investigator; an unidentified policeman, who on 24   August

  At 12.28 p.m. the applicant was removed from her cell and viewed the video with her solicitor and the policeman.