CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD003172102
13 octobre 2009
After the interrogation, the applicant was placed in pre-trial detention on the order of the judge. 8.
Page 13 sur 1634
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD002482903
The first trial 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD001853205
The Court recalls that, in assessing whether or not a trial was fair, regard should be had to the entirety of the proceedings ( John Murray v. the United Kingdom , 8 February 1996, § 63,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD002357404
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD001753403
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1015JUD005548407
15 octobre 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD002370702
20 octobre 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD002970004
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD001854506
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD002550603
He would submit his defence arguments to the trial court after his client, the applicant, had given evidence to the trial court in person. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD001830802
When the criminal proceedings ended, the trial before the İzmir Labour Court resumed. The court ordered further expert reports and heard evidence from witnesses.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD002592406
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD004080707
On an unspecified date in 1993 the applicant was committed for trial before the Suwałki District Court on a charge of car theft. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD000085808
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD001118104
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD000775505
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD002950303
On 30 March 1992 the applicant's trial began before the Ankara Criminal Court of First Instance.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1022JUD001270208
22 octobre 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1022JUD003915104
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD003355205
27 octobre 2009