By recourse to this principle courts ensure that executive agents of the state do not misuse the coercive, law enforcement functions of the courts and thereby oppress citizens of the state.

In addition, there was other indirect evidence, including statements by his co-defendants in court, that the applicant had shared with them information concerning the act in issue.

chambre correctionnelle, du 19 septembre 1996 qui, dans la procédure suivie contre Félix X... pour blessures involontaires, a prononcé sur les intérêts civils ; Vu le mémoire ampliatif et le mémoire additionnel

His health had not deteriorated since his admission to the social care home in 2002, with the result that the conditions of his stay there remained unchanged.

to that stay.

Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Political party prohibited from receiving funds from a foreign legal entity representing its main source of funding: admissible The applicant party is the

and her confused and disoriented state.

. ; qu'au stade du présent examen, il ne peut être occulté que cette demande d'explications s'inscrit dans la logique du témoignage non seulement de Rahmouna B...

, if not solely, on these self ‑ incriminating statements.

    The applicant was diagnosed with ischemic heart disease, stenocardia, hypertensive diseases (stage II), chronic cholecystitis (remission stage) and pancreatitis (remission stage), type-2

    During the trial, M.K. also denied the statements he had made during the investigation stage of the proceedings without having had access to a lawyer. 16.

him stay with him because he was afraid. 10.

On the basis of the affidavit, McDonald’s were permitted to amend their statement at a late stage in the trial.

States authorities.

a witness statement in lieu of live evidence at trial must be a measure of last resort; (iv)     the admission as evidence of statements of absent witnesses results in a potential disadvantage

statements obtained from the co-defendants in the absence of a lawyer and under alleged duress during the preliminary investigation stage (see, in respect of the applicant Hakan Duman v.

they all withdrew their initial statements at the trial stage.

The applicant challenged them and disputed the record of the witness confrontation and all the charges, and also the gendarmes’ statements.

The Court found that similar considerations applied in respect of an alien who had established social ties amounting to private life in the territory of a State during a period of unlawful stay.

    On 23 September 1992 M. made a statement about its registration as a shared company, 58.2% of the shares of which were to be distributed to the staff and the rest remained State property.