The Government contested these claims as unsubstantiated.

Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7AE800C3 { width:4.28pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sD051EF8 { width:3.72pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s695E2BCF { margin-top

    The Government contested these claims as unsubstantiated and excessive.

One of them had been carrying an Albanian identity card and a certain amount of Macedonian denars. The migrants had been fluent in Macedonian.

  In a new decision of 21 August 1984, the Building Committee conceded that a mistake had been made, and, therefore, quashed its decision of 12 June 1984 and took a new decision of similar contents

    The applicant contested the Government’s arguments. 3.     Conclusion 32.

  Since they did not respond by that date, the Court fixed a new time-limit, 18 April 1984.   23.

He had never had any contact with them before. Since P.K. was fluent in Macedonian, the applicant could not have suspected that he (P.K.) was a migrant.

Thus, the new law applied new rules to situations that had arisen before it came into force and which had already given rise to claims in this respect in pending proceedings, thereby producing a retrospective

    He argued that the intention underlying the treatment was to punish and intimidate him, as the treatment went well beyond security needs.

The investigating judge ( Commissario della Legge Inquirente ) joined the two investigations. 26 .

Roman'; display:inline-block } .s8B983D37 { text-transform:none } .sBB64854C { width:8.45pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sE8F2C496 { width:5.11pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display

    The general context 6.

Roman'; display:inline-block } .sD051EF8 { width:3.72pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s4196892D { width:3.17pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sD11CFAB7 { margin-top

    The Government contested the applicant's claims for the reasons stated above. 48.

Invité à présenter une pièce d’identité, le requérant avait refusé et – défiant leur présence ( sprezzante della loro presenza ) – il s’était assis sur une chaise et avait résisté passivement.

    Despite the law, by circular no. 160 of 18 July 1988 the Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale (“INPS”), an Italian welfare entity, considered that the two benefits (concession and

He also raised a new complaint, in substance under Article   6, in connection with his requests for the reopening of the proceedings (see paragraphs 14-19 above). 41.

It ordered that such an examination be carried out by the Defence Ministry’s Medical Board ( Collegio Medico Legale della Difesa – the “Medical Board”), by means of a medical assessment in the presence