CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0326JUD001123911
26 mars 2015
    The Court’s assessment (a)     General principles 41.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1006JUD003282009
6 octobre 2011
La publication directe ou par voie de reproduction de cette allégation ou de cette imputation est punissable, même si elle est faite sous forme dubitative ou si elle vise une personne ou un corps non expressément
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201JUD000915708
1 février 2022
In particular, it noted that the applicant had not disputed the facts of the case.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184687
19 juin 2018
The fact that it arises for consideration in the context of the proper implementation of the United Kingdom’s Convention obligation does not involve the creation of new principles.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0611JUD001984408
11 juin 2015
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1959 and lives in Vienna. 6.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC006847610
11 octobre 2011
de ceux pour lesquels elle a été accordée (règle dite du «   principe de spécialité   » – principio di specialità ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD006519211
26 juin 2014
visés ne constituaient pas des délits punissables sur le territoire national.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0921DEC005872900
21 septembre 2004
la preuve de la vérité des faits diffamatoires, ne saurait ensuite soutenir que les termes ou expressions incriminées ne seraient pas diffamatoires, faute de contenir l'imputation d'un fait précis susceptible
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD001804108
23 juin 2016
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A.     Criminal proceedings against the applicant 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0202JUD003035211
2 février 2023
    The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. 5 .     The applicant is the sole owner of Maksima, a company established in Azerbaijan in 1997. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD003862303
23 octobre 2012
The finding that the applicant might abscond, re-offend or interfere with the investigation was not supported by facts. 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD005438108
10 avril 2018
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASES A.     Ms Tsvetkova (application no. 54381/08) 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109DEC002260418
9 novembre 2023
    The applicant association was created in 2008 and its purpose is to contribute to the restoration and maintenance of the principles of Christian faith in society.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD003026117
8 octobre 2019
As a general principle, the national authorities are best placed to assess not just the facts but, more particularly, the credibility of witnesses since it is they who have had an opportunity to see, hear
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1006JUD004227615
6 octobre 2020
THE FACTS 2.     The applicants, whose details are set out in the Appendix, were represented respectively by Ms D.S.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0118JUD000416113
18 janvier 2022
  It may be punishable with a fine or up to fifteen days’ detention. 12 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0625JUD001377888
25 juin 1992
Public opinion is, of course, in itself a fact and its origins are generally less important and less open to dispute ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0609JUD001634702
9 juin 2011
Should the defendant fail to appear before the court, he or she could be brought before it by the police. 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0226JUD006399700
26 février 2009
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1967 and lives in Taganrog, Rostov Region. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD002896310
18 juillet 2013
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1949 and lives in Donji Miholjac. 6.
Page 132 sur 195
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.