Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202231
11 mars 2020
11 mars 2020
BARTOLO against Malta lodged on 22 July 2019 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Joseph Bartolo, is a Maltese national, who was born in 1950 and lives in Marsa.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1210DEC002224618
10 décembre 2019
10 décembre 2019
The application had been communicated to the Government .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC003065803
12 janvier 2010
12 janvier 2010
In view of the above, the Court notes that the proceedings have been pending for nearly ten years overall, which is undoubtedly excessive.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD003305509
25 mars 2014
25 mars 2014
According to the Court’s case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0122JUD006286800
22 janvier 2008
22 janvier 2008
On 5 October 2005 the applicant's legal representative notified the Court that, as regards WMA, a friendly settlement had been reached between the parties as Mr Herbert had been offered EUR [1]
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC001798809
14 février 2012
14 février 2012
In spite of the applicant’s efforts to have the judgment enforced, it has not been enforced to date. 2. The Olaru and others pilot judgment and its consequences for similar cases 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC001412606
15 juin 2010
15 juin 2010
} THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 14126/06 by Saida NIAZI against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 15 June 2010 as a Chamber composed of: Josep
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68149-68617
16 mai 2000
16 mai 2000
The Commission further found, by 24 votes to 3, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4, in that the applicant had not been able to have the lawfulness of his detention reviewed speedily by a
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68140-68608
7 mars 2000
7 mars 2000
Having declared the application partly admissible, the Commission adopted a report on 17 September 1998 in which it expressed the unanimous opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6 §
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC000558203
16 décembre 2008
16 décembre 2008
The Court takes note that following the settlement reached between the parties the matter has been resolved at the domestic level and that the applicant does not wish to pursue her application.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0901DEC003908107
1 septembre 2009
1 septembre 2009
The applicant initially complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings against him had been unreasonably long. 2.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2151417-2285315
16 octobre 2007
16 octobre 2007
He could therefore have reasonably assumed that the information he had used had been reliable.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68151-68619
19 janvier 2000
19 janvier 2000
action in which he sought to be granted rights that Decree no. 118 of 1990 afforded persons who had been persecuted by the communist regime.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0907DEC004028598
7 septembre 1999
7 septembre 1999
The applicant complains that if leave had been granted the Crown would have been represented at the hearing of the appeal whereas the applicant would not.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0926JUD003534905
26 septembre 2006
26 septembre 2006
(an obligation to carry out improvements) will run from the date on which the keys of the said house shall have been given back by the government to the said Joseph Camilleri.” 6.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913DEC006175108
13 septembre 2011
13 septembre 2011
No objection ( bezwaar ) had been lodged against the decision to terminate the benefits.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194258
5 juin 2019
5 juin 2019
the case for others who had similar properties in the area and who had been subject to the same takings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC000860805
20 septembre 2011
20 septembre 2011
The cell had been damp and had lacked access to natural light; there had been low-intensity electric lighting which had always been switched on.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD004657509
21 juin 2011
21 juin 2011
It followed that the applicants’ property rights had been breached and that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.1 to the Convention. 22.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019DEC005631119
19 octobre 2021
19 octobre 2021
Thus, for the period 1980 to 2017 the applicant had received EUR 13,817 while according to the expert the rent due would have been of EUR 47,593.
Source officiellePage 14 sur 136