CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000970402
16 décembre 2003
On 5 March 1992 the applicant’s house in Sukošan, Croatia was destroyed by a mine laid by unknown perpetrator.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000952002
On 8 May 1991 the applicants’ house in Sukošani, Croatia was arsoned and on 1 July 1992 destroyed by a mine laid down by unknown perpetrator.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC001531202
In the night from 13 to 14 April 1993 the applicant’s house in Gospić, Croatia was destroyed by a mine laid down by unknown perpetrator.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000950402
On 3 September 1992 the applicant’s house in Josipdol, Croatia was mined by unknown perpetrators.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000951402
In the night of 13 to 14 July 1992 the applicant’s house in Sukošan, Croatia was destroyed by a mine laid down by unknown perpetrator.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1343343-1415091
26 mai 2005
Croatia (no. 2448/03)   Violation of Article 13 The applicant, Ivan Debelić, is a Croatian national, born in 1939 and living in Rab (Croatia).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0723JUD003209612
23 juillet 2015
Croatia , no.   57856/11, § 78, 12 June 2014). 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906JUD007215213
6 septembre 2016
Section 2 “The Republic of Croatia shall be liable for the damage referred to in section 1 of this Act on [the basis of] the principles of social solidarity, equal distribution of public burdens and fair
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0623DEC002283014
23 juin 2015
Poland , no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007), including those brought against Croatia (see, for example, Horvat v. Croatia , no. 51585/99, ECHR   2001 VIII; Kozlica v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194158
31 mai 2019
Croatia , no. 20883/09, §   51, 13   December 2011; and Rostomashvili v. Georgia , no. 13185/07, §   59, 8   November 2018).
ECLI:CEDH:001-194931
2 juillet 2019
Croatia , no. 20883/09, § 51, 13 December 2011; and Rostomashvili v. Georgia , no. 13185/07, § 59, 8 November 2018). QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
ECLI:CEDH:001-196118
28 août 2019
  Croatia , no. 51198/08, 25   April 2013; Ömer Güner v.   Turkey , no.   28338/07, 4 September 2018; and compare Dominka v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0512DEC002900307
12 mai 2015
In 1969 it opened an office in Zagreb in the then Socialist Republic of Croatia.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0212DEC003325002
12 février 2004
by Croatia of the rights recognised in the Convention through any act, decision or event occurring after 5 November 1997.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000446902
On 28 March 1992 the applicants’ house in Vugrovec, Croatia was destroyed by a mine laid down by unknown perpetrator.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000913802
In the night from 6 to 7 May 1992 the applicants’ house in Novska, Croatia was burglarised and then burned down by unknown perpetrators.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926DEC005811200
26 septembre 2002
On 15 May 1995 the Republic of Croatia filed its reply denying the plaintiff’s claim. It requested the court to stay the proceedings until the end of war in Croatia.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1031257-1072814
24 juin 2004
Croatia (application no. 5266/02)   Violation of Article 6 § 1 Jorgić v. Croatia (no. 70446/01)   Friendly settlement Kresović v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC006420909
17 septembre 2013
  56026/00, 10 May 2007), including those brought against Croatia (see, for example, Horvat v. Croatia , no.   51585/99, ECHR   2001 ‑ VIII; Kozlica v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0825DEC002433513
25 août 2015
Page 14 sur 156