de la SELARL SELARL LEXAVOUE, avocat au barreau de PAU Assistée de Maître LIEF, de la SCP GRAVELLIER - LIEF - DE LAGAUSIE - RODRIGUES, avocat au barreau de BORDEAUX SCP BOUTIN-TOURNIER-BERTRAND-MARTINEAU

    The Government argued that the circumstances of the present case differed from those in the case Marttinen v.

a criminal offence within the meaning of Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (compare and contrast Heaney and McGuinness , cited above, §§   41-42; Shannon , cited above, §   38; and Marttinen

Leander écrivit au commandant en chef de la marine (chefen för marinen) afin de connaître les raisons de cette impossibilité.

  Austria , nos. 58452/00 and 61920/00, §§ 52-59, 10 January 2008; and Marttinen v.   Finland , no. 19235/03, § 73, 21 April 2009).

Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Agent , Mr Mostafa Mihraje, Foreign Affairs Adviser, Human Rights Section, Legal Affairs Department, Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs, Counsel , Mr François Martineau

Martineau, lawyers practising in Sofia and Paris respectively. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Para. 23-80; Marinan v Vibart [1963] 1QB 234 & 528; Hargreaves v Bretherton [1959] 1QB 45).

   Following the advice of the Security Chief of the Naval Base, the applicant wrote to the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy (chefen för marinen) requesting to be informed of the reasons why he

by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Mr Rauno Koivusaari, and Mr   Mikael Marttinen