14 place Pancaut312 avenue Martyrs de la Résistance 40000 Mont de MarsanAT 313 CHI MONT DE MARSAN 1 rue Cherche midi 417 avenue Pierre de Coubertin 40000 Mont de MarsanAT 324 BATS Veronica 8 avenue Sadi

At the same time, it found that in view of the duration of the suspension the interference had been disproportionate and in violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and its constitutional equivalent.

The dispute between them and L. was therefore not finally resolved and the various proceedings, taken together, lasted almost twelve years.

  Summaries of the repetitive cases (in which the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the European Convention on Human Rights) can be found at the

Moreover, they considered that judges had to be able to examine different cases by the same parties, issues of partiality preventing only the examination of one and the same issue twice by the same judge

Convention does not preclude identification (for the purposes of Article 6   §   3   (d)) of an accused with his counsel — in the circumstances, the handicaps under which the defence laboured

He also alleges that the length of his detention on remand which lasted for ten years exceeded the reasonable-time requirement.

The first set of proceedings had lasted until 26 October 2001, while the application was introduced on 27 January 2006.

Instead she was issued with a summons to testify and was interviewed on that same date. A witness statement record was drawn up and she was informed of the rights and obligations of witnesses.

On the same day the applicant was brought before a judge, who ordered his detention pending trial.

They thus lasted about six years and three months.

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

    In the applicant’s view, both sets of proceedings had pursued the same purpose and had addressed the same aspect of unlawful conduct.

had lasted for over two years and five months for one level of jurisdiction.

Rassokhin whom they had been able to find in prisons of the Samara Region had never been detained in the same cell of the same prison of the Samara Region at the same time as the applicant.

coming under jurisdiction of two sets of courts, administrative and ordinary - furthermore, as in present case, an administrative court might have to rule on lawfulness of initial stage of proceedings at same

They alleged that they were ill-treated by the police at the time of their arrest and before being brought before a court, a period which lasted from two to six days depending on the individual case.

Without invoking any specific provisions of the Convention the applicant complained about poor conditions of his pre-trial detention at the Bergen Police Headquarters, which had lasted for “five days,

Under the same provision, the application further pertains to an alleged breach of the applicant’s right to be tried within a reasonable time, given that the proceedings before the domestic courts lasted

A complaint based on the same facts was also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention.