CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-292
10 novembre 2011
He had been detained there on account of an alleged lack of cell space despite the fact that a senator who had visited the cell on 26   January 2009, twenty-five days after the fire and seventeen
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221135
27 octobre 2022
MATTER OF THE CASE The applicants are public prosecutors who, on 15 September 2003, were admitted to a special training course for judges and public prosecutors and on 26   January 2004 were selected
Tribunal Administratif de Mayotte
ORTA_2205664_20221114
14 novembre 2022
administrative : 1°) de suspendre l'exécution de l'arrêté n° 26182/2022 du 10 novembre 2022 par lequel le préfet de Mayotte l'a obligé à quitter le territoire français sans délai, accompagné de Sélestine
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109DEC001757905
9 novembre 2010
under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 17,000   (seventeen
Reconduite à la frontière
DTA_2312266_20230929
29 septembre 2023
C D, représenté, par Me Seltene, demande au tribunal d'annuler l'arrêté du 4 septembre 2023 par lequel le préfet du Val-d'Oise l'a obligé à quitter sans délai le territoire français, a fixé le pays à destination
2ème Chambre
DCA_21VE03272_20231130
30 novembre 2023
A, représenté par Me Seltène, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement ; 2°) d'annuler la décision de rejet implicite de sa demande indemnitaire ; 3°) de condamner La Poste à lui verser la somme
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0709JUD001926392
9 juillet 1997
   By deferring payment of the compensation for seventeen months, the national authorities rendered that compensation inadequate and, consequently, upset the balance between the protection of
ECLI:CEDH:001-113577
11 septembre 2012
(a) Four members shall be selected by the House of Representatives of the Federation, and two members by the Assembly of the Republika Srpska.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427DEC003674805
27 avril 2010
A competition was organised for the purpose of recruiting journalists and, as a result, many journalists who had protested earlier against censorship were not selected.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1559
28 avril 2009
The applicants were selected and invited to take part in the competition. However, they were not included on the shortlist of candidates who passed the written examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104DEC001829104
4 novembre 2008
Out of seventeen hearings held by the courts, three were adjourned either at the request of the applicant or due to his failure to appear, two were adjourned due to both parties’ failure to appear, six
ECLI:CEDH:001-206685
17 novembre 2020
  Maksym Petrovych BORYSOV     23/03/2018 29/03/2018 Unrecorded detention; Absence of an effective procedure to challenge the lawfulness of detention on remand 10 50900/18 16/10/2018 Selegey
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0608JUD006014800
8 juin 2006
sterling), which includes GBP 18,500 (eighteen thousand five hundred pounds sterling) for non-pecuniary damage, GBP 6,500 (six thousand five hundred pounds sterling) for pecuniary damage and GBP 17,475 (seventeen
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0506DEC005218021
6 mai 2025
The expert identified seventy-two plots of land sold during a previous period and meeting the statutory requirements to qualify as market comparable, and then selected eight of them, most similar to that
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1216JUD006400900
16 décembre 2004
    On 29 October 2004, the Court received the following declaration from the Government: “I declare that the Government of Italy offer to pay 5,717.70 euros (five thousand seven hundred seventeen
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD000684107
20 décembre 2011
It thus lasted some seventeen years and ten months to date before three levels of jurisdiction.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10556
23 septembre 1994
Conclusion : respondent State to pay specified sums to the applicant (seventeen votes to two).
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55513
27 septembre 1991
brought before the Court by the Commission on 18 December 1987;        Whereas in its judgment of 22 June 1989 the Court:        -   held by seventeen
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68133-68601
10 octobre 2000
partly admissible, the Commission adopted a report on 26 October 1999 in which it expressed the opinion that there had been a violation of Article   6   §   1 of the Convention (by seventeen
ECLI:CEDH:002-3797
24 mai 2005
list (and suggested the system be amended), but did not consider that he had been subjected to burdensome treatment for the simple reason that he had to serve as a juror three times over a span of seventeen
Page 14 sur 137
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.