On 19 April 1993 the trial court, sitting in camera , decided to transfer the case to the civil court. The applicant appealed against this decision. B.

On 15 December 2021 the DCSC, sitting in camera at first instance, gave resolution no.

228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 73033/01 by Şendoğan YAZICI against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

In particular, he claims that two lawyers of the Tyrolean Bar Chamber sitting as judges in the Appeals Board lacked impartiality.

On 15 December 1993, after having deliberated, the Regional Court sitting in chambers ( Arrondissementsrechtbank in Raadkamer ), composed of Ms O., Ms P. and Mr B., rejected the objection.

His request was rejected on 1 April 2005 by the provisional-measures judge of the Regional Court of The Hague sitting in Haarlem. 38.

. # Ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder - social sikring - invalidepensioner - boligydelse. # Sag C-243/90.

#Ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder - social sikring - ophør af retten til ydelser ved uarbejdsdygtighed i tilfælde af tildeling af ydelser til efterladte.#Sag C-337/91.

#Traktatbrud - social sikring - artikel 69 og 71 i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/71 - ydelser ved arbejdsløshed - grænsearbejdere - fortsat ret til ydelser, når den arbejdsløse søger beskæftigelse i en anden

.sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 33934/05 by Gerhard SCHMID and Others against Austria The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 55148/00 by Vasil Serafimov and Rayna Georgieva DIMITROVI against Bulgaria The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 38766/03 by Ibrahim Yacoub YOUSSEF and Others against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 1278/16 Janos FERENCZ against Romania   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 38965/02 by Aimable MUSHIMIYIMANA against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting

228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 2543/05 by Petar KOCANKOVSKI against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

s5A070004 { width:213.96pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 39982/09 Aurel Constantin PARALESCU against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

Based on this information, the applicant challenged the lay assessor judges sitting in his case arguing that they did not meet the requirements for a lawfully appointed judge ( zákonný sudca ).

Turkey - 60856/00 Judgment 7.2.2006 [Section II] Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 Right to education Annulment of the successful results of a candidate sitting university admission exams given his poor results

The serving officer mentioned that he recognised a man sitting at the back of the court as a police officer, but prosecuting counsel explained that the man would not be called as a witness.