It therefore did not appear that the applicant could have foreseen that she would be held responsible for organising the illegal entry or illegal stay of non-nationals in so far as the required element

. # Alpha Steel Ltd. tegen Commissie van de Europese Gemeenschappen. # Regeling produktiequota staal. # Zaak 14/81.

EST 13 RUE DU GENERAL BEURET 75712 PARIS CEDEX 15 non comparante Société SARL F.BLAYO 8 rue brea 75006 PARIS non comparante COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL Présidente : Emmanuelle RICHARD Greffière : Stellie

JUGEMENT DU 9 Janvier 2026 6ème Chambre N° PCL : 2025J00914 SAS STUD SAVEURS N° RG: 2025L01908 DEBITEUR SAS STUD SAVEURS [Adresse 1] RCS [Localité 1] : 804645034 - 2021 B 6253 Représentant légal : Ste

. # Phoenix-Rheinrohr AG v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community. # Case 20-58. # Felten und Guilleaume Carlswerk Eisen- und Stahl AG and Walzwerke AG v High Authority of the European

Her stay in the country was authorised until 29   November 2018.

decision of 17 September 2015 the investigator stayed the investigation on the grounds that the identity of the offender had not been established, despite the fact that all the possible investigative steps

The Court found that similar considerations applied in respect of an alien who had established social ties amounting to private life in the territory of a State during a period of unlawful stay.

His last residence permit authorised his stay until 26 September 2017. 4.

#Manchester Steel Limited κατά Επιτροπής των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων.#Χάλυβας - Ποσοστώσεις παραγωγής - Υπέρβαση.#Υπόθεση 46/85.

#Société des Aciéries du Temple v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community.#Case 36-62.

#US Steel Košice s.r.o. protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica.#Tužba za poništenje - Nedopuštenost.#Predmet T-22/07.

#British Steel plc contra Comissão das Comunidades Europeias.#Intervenção - Confidencialidade.#Processo T-89/96.

They said that the authorities had taken urgent steps to clarify the situation in the orphanage and undertook to keep the Italian Government informed of any developments.

    On 2 December 2014 the Court requested the Government to indicate whether they envisaged taking any steps in response to the Tarakhel v.

He also requested an interim measure (stay of removal) from the Russian courts.

    On 2 December 2014 the Court requested the Government to indicate whether they envisaged taking any steps in response to the Tarakhel v.

    On 2 December 2014 the Court requested the Government to indicate whether they envisaged taking any steps in response to the Tarakhel v.

    On 2 December 2014 the Court requested the Government to indicate whether they envisaged taking any steps in response to the Tarakhel v.

    On 2 December 2014 the Court requested the Government to indicate whether they envisaged taking any steps in response to the Tarakhel   v.