CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188511
22 novembre 2018
In particular;   (a)     Was the judgment of the trial court based on police statements taken from the applicant as a result of ill-treatment?
ECLI:CEDH:001-142475
20 mars 2014
In addition, no significant improvements had been made as regards the provision of work to prisoners.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0427JUD000357109
27 avril 2017
    The applicant alleged, in particular, that she had been denied a fair trial as a result of admission by the Court of Appeal of pre-trial witness statements that were not read out in court
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715
21 novembre 2019
The second applicant’s statements were incoherent on the issue of the duration of his stay in Serbia and the submission of a request for asylum.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1128JUD001092984
28 novembre 1988
   According to Professor Tolstrup, who was responsible for the applicant’s treatment at the State Hospital, the procedure followed in connection with admission was the usual one: the holder
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC001403308
16 décembre 2008
In addition, the applicant was admitted for medical reasons to a State-sponsored programme providing drug addicts with methadone.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429DEC002605704
29 avril 2008
According to Government, during her stay at the hospital the applicant had been rude to the medical staff and had refused to submit to certain medical tests.
Tribunal Administratif de Toulouse
DTA_2502174_20250415
15 avril 2025
professionnalisant, d'une durée de six semaines, doit absolument s'effectuer dans un pays de l'Union européenne, stage trouvé pour les mois de mai et juin 2025 comme en atteste la promesse de stage transmise
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13592
8 mars 2022
In addition, statements by his co-accused, taken without a lawyer being present, were relied upon by the Assize Court in the reasons given for the applicant’s conviction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD004802306
21 juin 2016
The court read out records of the statements made by the victims at the pre-trial stage and heard testimony from one of the victims.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11024
19 janvier 2016
editor in chief, with a view to identifying the whistle-blowing State employee.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615JUD003433404
15 juin 2010
According to this statement, between October 2003 and August 2004 the applicant had regularly applied to the medical staff of the detention facility and had received medical consultations and out-patient
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68311-68779
10 octobre 2000
The prison staff interviewed by the public prosecutor affirmed the Government’s account of the incident.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0523JUD004418704
23 mai 2013
The Guidelines state as follows. 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527JUD002656505
27 mai 2008
in order to continue to benefit from medical, social or other forms of assistance provided by the expelling State during their stay in prison.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0106DEC001552108
6 janvier 2015
members jointly selected by the staff council and management. 9.
ECLI:CEDH:001-172620
10 mars 2017
She regularly had to ask the staff for toilet paper. She did not have a shower during her stay at the hospital, while other patients could have a shower every eight to ten days.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617JUD006970001
17 juin 2003
    On 11 December 1997, noting that all five time-limited stages for the presentation of evidence had expired, C.R. requested the opening of the time-limited stage for the filing of final submissions
ECLI:CEDH:001-207833
4 janvier 2021
If so, was that lack of legal representation remedied at the later stages of the proceedings (see, for example, Zachar and Čierny v. Slovakia , nos. 29376/12 and 29384/12, § 81, 21 July 2015)?
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0211JUD004568122
11 février 2025
On 10   July 2017 the Supreme Court declared the applicant’s case admissible.
Page 14 sur 2628