CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

52 546 résultats pour « admission au stage »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188511

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2018

22 novembre 2018

In particular;   (a)     Was the judgment of the trial court based on police statements taken from the applicant as a result of ill-treatment?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142475

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2014

20 mars 2014

In addition, no significant improvements had been made as regards the provision of work to prisoners.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0427JUD000357109

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2017

27 avril 2017

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that she had been denied a fair trial as a result of admission by the Court of Appeal of pre-trial witness statements that were not read out in court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2019

21 novembre 2019

The second applicant’s statements were incoherent on the issue of the duration of his stay in Serbia and the submission of a request for asylum.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1128JUD001092984

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 1988

28 novembre 1988

   According to Professor Tolstrup, who was responsible for the applicant’s treatment at the State Hospital, the procedure followed in connection with admission was the usual one: the holder

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC001403308

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2008

16 décembre 2008

In addition, the applicant was admitted for medical reasons to a State-sponsored programme providing drug addicts with methadone.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429DEC002605704

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2008

29 avril 2008

According to Government, during her stay at the hospital the applicant had been rude to the medical staff and had refused to submit to certain medical tests.

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Toulouse

DTA_2502174_20250415

Administratif

15 avril 2025

15 avril 2025

professionnalisant, d'une durée de six semaines, doit absolument s'effectuer dans un pays de l'Union européenne, stage trouvé pour les mois de mai et juin 2025 comme en atteste la promesse de stage transmise

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13592

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2022

8 mars 2022

In addition, statements by his co-accused, taken without a lawyer being present, were relied upon by the Assize Court in the reasons given for the applicant’s conviction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD004802306

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2016

21 juin 2016

The court read out records of the statements made by the victims at the pre-trial stage and heard testimony from one of the victims.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11024

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2016

19 janvier 2016

editor in chief, with a view to identifying the whistle-blowing State employee.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615JUD003433404

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2010

15 juin 2010

According to this statement, between October 2003 and August 2004 the applicant had regularly applied to the medical staff of the detention facility and had received medical consultations and out-patient

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68311-68779

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2000

10 octobre 2000

The prison staff interviewed by the public prosecutor affirmed the Government’s account of the incident.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0523JUD004418704

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2013

23 mai 2013

The Guidelines state as follows. 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527JUD002656505

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2008

27 mai 2008

in order to continue to benefit from medical, social or other forms of assistance provided by the expelling State during their stay in prison.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0106DEC001552108

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2015

6 janvier 2015

members jointly selected by the staff council and management. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172620

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2017

10 mars 2017

She regularly had to ask the staff for toilet paper. She did not have a shower during her stay at the hospital, while other patients could have a shower every eight to ten days.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617JUD006970001

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2003

17 juin 2003

    On 11 December 1997, noting that all five time-limited stages for the presentation of evidence had expired, C.R. requested the opening of the time-limited stage for the filing of final submissions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-207833

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2021

4 janvier 2021

If so, was that lack of legal representation remedied at the later stages of the proceedings (see, for example, Zachar and Čierny v. Slovakia , nos. 29376/12 and 29384/12, § 81, 21 July 2015)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0211JUD004568122

Admin. suprême

11 février 2025

11 février 2025

On 10   July 2017 the Supreme Court declared the applicant’s case admissible.

Source officielle

Page 14 sur 2628

← PrécédentSuivant →