CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

149 653 résultats pour « obligation du conducteur »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0420DEC006515917

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2021

20 avril 2021

Lastly, she complained that the investigation conducted into her allegations had been ineffective. She relied on Articles 3, 8, 13 and   14 of the Convention. THE LAW 18.

Page 14 sur 7483

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0204DEC002538418

Admin. suprême

4 février 2025

4 février 2025

X was granted contact rights.

Source officielle
CA

1ère CHAMBRE CIVILE

67908ce01b5a79f7327055cc

Appel

21 janvier 2025

21 janvier 2025

[O] [D] a relevé appel de ce jugement en ce qu'il a : - dit que les fautes de conduite de M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707DEC001078819

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2020

7 juillet 2020

The Government admit that the treatment to which the applicant was subjected and the investigation conducted into his allegations did not meet the standards enshrined in Article 3 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-568835-571231

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2002

13 juin 2002

applicant’s son; -           the authorities’ failure to provide timely medical care; and, -           Bulgaria’s obligations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1015DEC005463013

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2019

15 octobre 2019

    Article 3 of the Convention gives rise to a positive obligation to conduct an official investigation where an individual raises an arguable claim of ill-treatment (see Assenov and Others

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD001488005

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2012

3 avril 2012

As regards the obligation to conduct an effective investigation, they contended that the inquiry into the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment had been prompt, thorough and conclusive on the point

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196789

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2019

17 septembre 2019

The Committee stated that Russia’s compliance with its obligations under the CEDAW Convention needed to be assessed “in the light of the level of gender sensitivity applied in the judicial handling of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0115DEC000815213

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2019

15 janvier 2019

It must also be stressed that the obligation to conduct an effective investigation applies equally to cases where a person has disappeared in circumstances which may be regarded as life ‑ threatening

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1104DEC000203015

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2025

4 novembre 2025

the SAC’s interpretation of the conditions of waiver in order to exculpate themselves from joint liability, the applicant companies complained, in particular, that the SAC had imposed on them an obligation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD005506418

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2022

10 novembre 2022

    The Court notes at the outset that the present case falls to be examined from the perspective of the State’s obligation to conduct an effective investigation under the procedural limb of

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2130525-2260973

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2007

4 octobre 2007

  The Court concluded that Russia had failed in its obligation to conduct an effective, prompt and thorough investigation into the killing of the applicant’s mother and brother, in violation of Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215188

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2021

20 décembre 2021

on her by S. and to conduct an effective investigation in that regard?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0124JUD000062313

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2023

24 janvier 2023

Voskanyan’s cellmates, conducted an examination of the scene, the body, seized his personal and medical files and assigned an autopsy. 10 .

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2041305-2164973

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2007

21 juin 2007

Accordingly, the Court drew inferences from the Government’s conduct and found, unanimously, that they had failed to comply with their obligations under Article 38 § 1 (a) to furnish all necessary facilities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD000166108

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2016

15 décembre 2016

    The applicant complained of the authorities’ failure to conduct an effective investigation into the incident of 9 June 2004.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2035943-2154696

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2007

12 juin 2007

  The applicants alleged that their relative had been killed deliberately and complained of the lack of thoroughness of the investigation into the death conducted by the authorities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0527DEC005932916

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2021

27 mai 2021

In the particular circumstances of the case, the Court considers that the authorities were under no obligation to conduct a more in-depth investigation into the applicant’s allegations than that which

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD002390615

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2025

23 octobre 2025

    In the Court’s view, that obligation was not met.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0616JUD006555714

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2020

16 juin 2020

known, and (c) the obligation to conduct an effective investigation when an arguable claim of ill-treatment has been raised (see Volodina , cited above, §§ 76-77). 30.

Source officielle