CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

25 790 résultats pour « Senet »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401DEC003067703

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2008

1 avril 2008

THE LAW By letter dated 30 March 2007 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 30

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113DEC002454204

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2007

13 novembre 2007

THE LAW By letter dated 9 June 2006 the Government’s complementary observations concerning the new domestic remedy with regard to the length of proceedings cases were sent to the applicant, who was requested

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0930DEC007183001

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2008

30 septembre 2008

THE LAW By letter dated 28 November 2007, the Government's observations were sent to the applicant's representative, who was requested to submit his observations together with any claims for just satisfaction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007DEC000988402

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2008

7 octobre 2008

THE LAW By letter dated 11 March 2008 the Government's observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 25

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1012DEC001399505

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2006

12 octobre 2006

On 20 January 2006 the Government’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the application were sent to the applicant’s home address.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4764

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2003

10 juillet 2003

final in October 1995 could be enforced and that, accordingly, the fact that he had been convicted of other offences did not prevent the grant of the remission of sentence applied for; the case was sent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6137

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 1999

14 décembre 1999

The Italian public prosecutor’s office sent an international request for judicial assistance to the American criminal court, under the Convention on Judicial Co-operation signed by Italy and the United

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7282

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

The army having been sent into the most sensitive areas, shots were fired from inside the Ministry of the Interior, which was surrounded by demonstrators.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210DEC001229706

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2013

10 décembre 2013

By letter dated 11 February 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 3 January 2013 and that no extension of time

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC001852409

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

By letter dated 11 February 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 9 January 2013 and that no extension of time

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC003809409

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

By letter dated 11 February 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 9 January 2013 and that no extension of time

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9221

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2013

1 octobre 2013

Conviction for offering mark of respect to leader of terrorist organisation (without any propaganda or incitement to acts of violence or terror): violation Facts – In July 2008 sixty-seven letters were sent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-766

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2011

13 septembre 2011

The same day the Court decided to apply Rule   39 and sent a fax at 6.36 p.m. to the Permanent Representation of Italy to the Council of Europe.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917DEC001347815

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2019

17 septembre 2019

    By letter dated 23 October 2018, sent by registered post, the applicant company’s representative, Mr Z.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202DEC003670003

Admin. suprême

2 février 2016

2 février 2016

By letter dated 17   September 2009, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 8   April 2009 and that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315DEC002845106

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2016

15 mars 2016

By letter dated 2 November 2010, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 22 July 2010 and that no extension of time

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311DEC001673105

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2021

11 mars 2021

By letters sent by registered post in October and November 2020, the applicants were notified that the time allowed for the submission of their observations or of certain requested information had expired

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1125DEC002652505

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2010

25 novembre 2010

THE LAW By letter dated 17   July 2009 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s representative, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007DEC005466207

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2010

7 octobre 2010

By letter of 19 January 2010 sent by registered mail, counsel for the applicant was advised that the period allowed for submission of the observations had expired and that no extension of time had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC001574907

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2014

15 avril 2014

Following their failure to reply by the time-limit set by the Court, the applicants were notified by letters sent by registered post that the period allowed for their submissions had expired and that no

Source officielle

Page 140 sur 1290

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.