However, the army must not be involved in any political activity and may not be used for political ends (section 46 para. 1).

consequently be permitted.

means employed and the aim sought to be achieved."

She asked that the boundaries of her and the applicant’s plot be amended and that the territory of the supposed public road be joined to their plot. The claim was dismissed.

How the balance was to be struck was a matter of judgment best made by those familiar with the Scottish prison system who had experience in dealing with both prisoners and solicitors in Scotland.

A sealed counter-sample must be left with the firm in question. Furthermore, a reserve sample must be drawn, for use should a further analysis be necessary.

    The Chamber to be constituted included ex officio Mr L.-E.

She also claims to be known as “Lemilia” to her friends and colleagues.

They could at best be a source of challenge, under section 281 § 1.4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (see paragraph 51 below), if a corresponding motion had been denied at the trial.

be summoned to be heard.

St Teresa or that the other woman who appears is intended to be her psyche.

That could not be delegated to an independent panel and if they were actuated by bias, apparent or real, then the decision would still have to be made by them.

dock inte emot bättre vetande ), i.e. negligent defamation, to be distinguished from public defamation “despite better knowledge”, that is to say, intentionally imputing an offence to T. whilst knowing

; however, this act can also be attacked separately”.

It raises issues under Articles 5 and 10 of the Convention.   B.     The proceedings   4.

  DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE POWER-FORDE JOINED BY JUDGE ZUPANČIČ This case raises an important question concerning the additional weight, if any, to be accorded to evidence of past torture in this

s foster parents were not to be communicated to the father and contact was only to be arranged after 30 September 1992, “in a neutral location to be determined by the ASE , and provided that there [was

He opined that if exhumation of the body were to be ordered, then toxic substances could possibly be found as they can be detected even years later.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Lalas v.