AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193944
23 mai 2019
23 mai 2019
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Did the deprivation of property in the present case impose an excessive and individual burden on the applicant within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201700
14 février 2020
14 février 2020
If not, did it impose a disproportionate burden on the applicant company?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184367
4 juin 2018
4 juin 2018
In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)? 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210801
2 juin 2021
2 juin 2021
Furthermore, did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182975
16 avril 2018
16 avril 2018
the requisite fair balance between the demands of the general interest and the requirements of the protection of the applicant’s right of property, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111077
15 avril 2012
15 avril 2012
In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225055
4 mai 2023
4 mai 2023
If so, was it in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim in the public interest, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on the applicants?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188505
22 novembre 2018
22 novembre 2018
Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant? In that connection, was the surplus amount he had paid reflected to the monthly pensions he received?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218714
4 juillet 2022
4 juillet 2022
did so because it had established that there was an alternative road leading to the applicants’ properties and that in those circumstances insisting on enforcement would impose excessive individual burden
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196366
2 septembre 2019
2 septembre 2019
In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants (see Mamidakis v. Greece, no. 35533/04, §§ 40-48, 11 January 2007)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193926
24 mai 2019
24 mai 2019
In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180256
19 décembre 2017
19 décembre 2017
In particular, did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250339
28 avril 2026
28 avril 2026
Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see, for general principles, Karahasanoğlu v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201931
24 février 2020
24 février 2020
If so, did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on the applicant, regard being had in particular to the severity of the sanction (see Sadocha v. Ukraine , no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-191075
22 janvier 2019
22 janvier 2019
If the interference was lawful, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis, Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179906
12 décembre 2017
12 décembre 2017
If so, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant association?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181333
7 février 2018
7 février 2018
In the affirmative, did that interference at issue impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225868
15 juin 2023
15 juin 2023
Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229665
24 novembre 2023
24 novembre 2023
Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Kryvenkyy v. Ukraine , no. 43768/07, 16 February 2017 and Bryg-A, TOV, v. Ukraine [Committee], no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225161
10 mai 2023
10 mai 2023
If so, was it in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim in the public interest, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on the applicant company
Source officiellePage 15 sur 375