CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

7 489 résultats pour « Buresen »

Tous
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193944

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2019

23 mai 2019

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Did the deprivation of property in the present case impose an excessive and individual burden on the applicant within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-201700

Admin. suprême

14 février 2020

14 février 2020

If not, did it impose a disproportionate burden on the applicant company?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184367

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2018

4 juin 2018

In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210801

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2021

2 juin 2021

Furthermore, did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182975

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2018

16 avril 2018

the requisite fair balance between the demands of the general interest and the requirements of the protection of the applicant’s right of property, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111077

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2012

15 avril 2012

    In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no.   22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225055

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2023

4 mai 2023

If so, was it in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim in the public interest, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on the applicants?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188505

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2018

22 novembre 2018

  Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant? In that connection, was the surplus amount he had paid reflected to the monthly pensions he received?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218714

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2022

4 juillet 2022

did so because it had established that there was an alternative road leading to the applicants’ properties and that in those circumstances insisting on enforcement would impose excessive individual burden

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196366

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2019

2 septembre 2019

In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants (see Mamidakis v.   Greece, no. 35533/04, §§ 40-48, 11 January 2007)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193926

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2019

24 mai 2019

In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180256

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2017

19 décembre 2017

  In particular, did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v.   Italy , [GC], no.   22774/93, §   59, ECHR   1999-V)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-250339

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2026

28 avril 2026

Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see, for general principles,   Karahasanoğlu v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-201931

Admin. suprême

24 février 2020

24 février 2020

If so, did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on the applicant, regard being had in particular to the severity of the sanction (see   Sadocha v. Ukraine , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-191075

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

If the interference was lawful, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis, Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179906

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

  If so, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant association?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181333

Admin. suprême

7 février 2018

7 février 2018

In the affirmative, did that interference at issue impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no.   22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225868

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2023

15 juin 2023

Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229665

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2023

24 novembre 2023

Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Kryvenkyy v.   Ukraine , no.   43768/07, 16 February 2017 and Bryg-A, TOV, v. Ukraine [Committee], no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225161

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2023

10 mai 2023

If so, was it in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim in the public interest, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on the applicant company

Source officielle

Page 15 sur 375

← PrécédentSuivant →