In the evening of the same day, the applicants and their legal counsel were summoned for questioning at the Police Headquarters.

Christopher Napier & Co., Solicitors, Belfast.           The facts of the present cases, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Based on this conclusion it had issued an injunction which had been limited to the claim that Dr S. had performed unlawful abortions and had put these within the same context as “aggravated murder”, and

It was only quoted in a press release of the same day which, however, did not include the phrase "as from today".

Jean-Christophe CHAZALETTE, Président de chambre Mme Patricia LEFEVRE, Conseillère qui en ont délibéré, un rapport a été présenté à l'audience par Monsieur Jean-Christophe CHAZALETTE, président dans

ETHIOPIAN ROADS AUTHORITY entité publique de droit éthiopien, ayant son siège social : [Adresse 6] (ETHIOPIE) prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux, Ayant pour avocat postulant : Me Christophe

Samir N..., domicilié [...], 26°/ M. Bernard O..., domicilié [...], 27°/ Mme Peggy P... épouse Q..., domiciliée [...], 28°/ M. Jean-Pierre R..., domicilié [...], 29°/ M.

Christophe I..., officier de Police judiciaire au commissariat de [...]   

This result was in stark contrast with the EUR   302, annually, willingly agreed by the applicants’ ancestors in the same year. 47.

The same applies in relation to an appeal to the tribunal which cannot be determined until the worker has been in the list for 9 months.

Christou ((1997) AC 117). In R v.

The applicant agreed to the offer and handed over to S. a sample of amphetamine which he had stored in a drawer of his garage.

  Christopher Napier, solicitor. One of the applicants, Mr.   Michael Tracey, was present during the hearing.   The Government were represented by their Agent, Mr.

Preparatory work did not have the same authentic character “however valuable it may sometimes be in throwing light on the expression of agreement in the text” (Yrbk. ILC (1966), ii. 219-220). 3.

In   August 2000, Mr Gorman brought an action against Lambeth for a declaration making the same claim.

Since the tribunal had declared the same day that it lacked competence to hear the case against Private Tuncay Deniz it was unable to take a decision on the applicant’s requests.

His request was refused by the University of Gothenburg on 30 August 2002, for the same reasons as its refusal to K, a decision against which E appealed to the Administrative Court of Appeal. 18.

The public prosecutor lodged a criminal-law appeal against the same judgment in respect of the A.D., the applicant and E.P. 14.

Christopher Napier, solicitor, Belfast.