For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§   3 and   4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Application no. 2512/21 Zsolt BUCSI against Hungary (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 10   November 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with   Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   37 § 1(b) of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2025)458 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Eriş

In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§   3 and   4 of the Convention.

SECTION DECISION Application no. 40146/16 Peter LEUTGEB against Austria The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 21   November   2017 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

}     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 1634/12 Rita ĀPŠA against Latvia The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 17 May 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article   37 of the Convention.

In accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention, the Court considers that the applicant has lost interest in his application.