CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104JUD005586311
4 novembre 2014
It may be subject to editorial revision.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1204DEC001518689
4 décembre 1989
  He may seek an order of mandamus against a recalcitrant LEA.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1210JUD004961606
10 décembre 2009
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Koottummel v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC004047713
25 juin 2019
It entered into force on 3 May 2008 and has to date been ratified by 177   States.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515DEC004431212
15 mai 2018
  3952/11, 2 May 2017).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1014DEC001541489
14 octobre 1991
  LORD JUSTICE MAY: That may well be.   Nevertheless show him a copy of our views as to the delay and the urgency of this matter.   Get this on for hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0829DEC003154196
29 août 2000
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0517DEC002345294
17 mai 1996
the performance of every policeman.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0626JUD000854379
26 juin 1986
(c) The "contestation" (dispute) may relate not only to "the actual existence of a ... right" but also to its scope or the manner in which it may be exercised (see the above-mentioned Le Compte, Van Leuven
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC002502994
14 janvier 1998
   Under Article 26 (Art. 26) of the Convention, the Commission may only deal with a matter after all domestic remedies have been exhausted.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC004530599
4 mai 2000
skill.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112DEC002816015
12 janvier 2016
    In February 2008 he was transferred to HMP Lowdham Grange and in May 2008 he commenced the six-week Enhanced Thinking Skills (“ETS”) course. He completed the course in July 2008.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1005DEC001608403
5 octobre 2004
He found that section 50 did not require the hospital to carry out prior consultation with the patient concerned but that even if it did this was a case where no different result would have occurred even
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0628DEC002354694
28 juin 1995
On 2 May 1991 M and J were again interviewed by social services and J gave a demonstration of moving in a sexual manner.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD002833313
8 octobre 2015
It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Tselovalnik v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0530JUD000875720
30 mai 2023
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701DEC005028618
1 juillet 2021
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. Background 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0316JUD005849313
16 mars 2017
Everyone shall be free to express his thoughts, but shall also be liable to answer for them in court. The law may never provide for censorship or other similar limitations to freedom of expression.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705JUD004641099
5 juillet 2005
    On 16   May 1993 the applicant got involved in a dispute in a café. He pulled a gun, which was loaded, and shot and hit a man in the leg.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704DEC007720916
4 juillet 2017
  Austria , 6 May 1985, § 33, Series A no. 92). 46.
Page 15 sur 31