The applicants further complain under the same Article about the lack of fair trial.

In the context of the COVID-19 health crisis, the national authorities by issuing successive joint ministerial decisions, decided school closures, which lasted from March 2020 to May 2020 and, after the

Complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

He alleged that the proceedings lasted unreasonably long and that the investigators lacked impartiality as they worked as external lecturers for one of the witnesses against him.

    The applicant was born in 1975 and lives in Saki. A.     Criminal proceedings 5.

      Repetitive cases   In the following cases the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:     Violation of

    In the same decision, the Regional Court extended the applicant’s detention until 19 December 2016.

same CFECC investigators and worded in the same way.

  Repetitive cases   In the following cases the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:     Violation of Article 6 § 1

The same day the applicant registered as an unemployed person, seeking new employment at the local unemployment office.

At the same time, she extended her claim to include her deceased aunt’s estate. 11.

It should be noted that, from the point of view of procedural safeguards for an accused, what is material is not how long his detention at the investigation stage has lasted and how long it has lasted

No one may be punished for the same criminal offence twice. ...”

Mr   Firik’s sentence was also deferred under the same Law.

On 27 April 1990 the court ordered an expert opinion concerning the same issues as the one already prepared in those proceedings.

On the same day the prosecutor requested the court to remand the applicant in custody.

They live in a house in Plovdiv situated in the same yard as the house of Ms   N.K. For years the applicants have been in bad relations with Ms N.K.’s family.

At 8.37 p.m. on the same day the investigator drew up a report on the applicant’s arrest.

On 7 September and 2 December 1999 the Regional Court, as confirmed by an appeal panel of the same court on 23 September and 22 December 1999, prolonged, for the same reasons, the applicant's detention

  The Court noted that the proceedings in question had lasted six years and seven months.