THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1979 and lives in Kharkiv. 6.

     ETABLISSEMENT DES FAITS         (par. 16 - 28) ....................................

contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de ROUEN, chambre correctionnelle, en date du 22 avril 1996, qui, dans la procédure suivie contre le premier pour escroqueries, a relaxé le prévenu pour certains faits

Referring to the Division’s case-law, it reiterated that under “newly emerged facts or changed circumstances” was to be understood facts or circumstances having occurred after the initial decision, i.c

   In Portugal criminal proceedings are in principle brought by the Public Prosecutor.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Thus, the described facts show totally conscious conduct on your part entailing a breach of the contractual good faith and an abuse of trust in the performance of the functions assigned, as well as clear

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.     The applicant was born in 1957 and lives in Kyiv. A.     Background to the case 8.

According to a principle inherent in our Constitution, it is forbidden to create a special court to give judgment on a specific act after it has been committed.

[his conduct] had not been punishable as long as he was not beating them, and the fact that the victims called the police only when ‘the water came to their neck’ since they are in permanent fear due

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.

The appellant, in his written statement, lays stress upon the undoubted fact that the whole of the second half consists of Teresa’s vision or dream.

In addition, an application, in principle, suspends payment of the fine.

  AS TO THE FACTS   I.     Circumstances of the case   7.

    The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. 5.

    Merits (a)     General principles 61.

He relied on Article   6 §   1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article   8 (right to respect for private and family life).

It specified that in principle neither evidence relating to the facts and events previously submitted in the courts, nor the admissibility of such evidence, nor the interpretation and application of the

confirmant l'ordonnance déférée, la chambre d'accusation a commis un excès de pouvoir, cause de nullité péremptoire ; qu'en effet, la chambre d'accusation saisie de l'appel d'une décision implicite de faire

Relevant principles 61.