CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0323DEC000030702
23 mars 2006
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0220DEC002249793
20 février 1995
       The facts as submitted by the parties may be summarised as follows.   A.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0305JUD006056909
5 mars 2024
in which identity parade carried out not in breach of fair trial requirements • Reclassification by Court of Appeal of charges applicant was convicted of, which was based on the same facts and could have
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD002402907
13 novembre 2012
    The MOPI Guidance also refers to the need to comply with the principles of the Data Protection Act (see paragraph 65-71 below). 39 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211JUD000449311
11 février 2020
(c)    “Necessary in a democratic society” (i)   General principles 46.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD000245004
9 avril 2009
    The Court’s assessment (a)     General principles 42.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0315REP001127484
15 mars 1990
  The applicant appealed against this decision to the Court of Appeal referring to the right to a fair trial in the light of the fact that his "opponent" was a professional prosecutor.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0225JUD001082884
25 février 1993
The defendant had a fair hearing.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0212JUD006144313
12 février 2019
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1971 and lives in Rostov-on-Don, Russia. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0518DEC002897295
18 mai 1999
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.   a.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0218JUD002597807
18 février 2010
with the judgment despite the fact that it had been rendered in absentia .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0319JUD001835791
19 mars 1997
Enfin, le Gouvernement combat l’analogie faite par la Commission dans son rapport entre l’affaire Van de Hurk c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1204JUD003507197
4 décembre 2003
Moreover, his conduct had been punishable by law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0623JUD003229710
23 juin 2015
He wrote, inter alia , that: “[The complainant] is a fanatic warrior of the faith for whom facts are just in the way. He has indisputably been caught at cold, intentional lying.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD003584102
7 décembre 2006
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.
cr
61372695cd58014677426bdf
8 mars 2005
480-5, L. 480-7 et R. 421-1 du Code de l'urbanisme, article préliminaire, 388, 593 du Code de procédure pénale, défaut de motifs, manque de base légale ; "en ce que l'arrêt attaqué a requalifié les faits
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD002375507
16 décembre 2014
    The domestic courts “must examine all the facts arguing for or against the existence of a genuine requirement of public interest justifying, with due regard to the principle of the presumption
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0913DEC002752104
13 septembre 2007
Lastly, in its judicial capacity the Conseil d’Etat has established the principle that a final criminal judgment is binding on the administrative courts in so far as findings of fact and declarations of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0607JUD005191419
7 juin 2022
THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1994. He currently lives in Konak, in the province of İzmir in Turkey. He was represented by Mr S.H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0305JUD003177516
5 mars 2019
    Other relevant facts 28.
Page 157 sur 195