CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0420DEC005693710
20 avril 2021
this complaint is incompatible ratione materiae within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 as those court decisions did not confer on the applicants property rights or any other rights whatsoever (see   Bici
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC000048902
30 mars 2006
Application no. 29559/02 by Hıdır Bilir Until October 1994 the applicant lived in Kuşluca, a village of the Ovacık district in Tunceli.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0616DEC001163213
16 juin 2016
13 15/03/2013 Mykola Stepanovych RAFALSKYY 10/01/1959 Verpa Ukrainian Ovruch District Court of Zhytomyr Region, 21/07/2009 Not enforced   22217/13 20/03/2013 Paraska Vasylivna KOSTYUK 23/05/1939 Bili
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD002887322
8 juillet 2025
The Government relied on Bici v. Albania (no. 5250/07, § 59, 3 December 2015). 58.
Page 16 sur 16
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.