CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0423JUD001469689
23 avril 1997
On 5 November 1980, on the applicants' further appeal, the Supreme Land Reform Board (Oberster Agrarsenat) quashed the Regional Board's decision and referred the case back to the
Page 16 sur 368
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0606REP001179685
6 juin 1990
However, it quashed the Provincial Board's decision insofar as the Board had refused to assume jurisdiction concerning the issues of alternative compensation parcels and monetary compensation.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709DEC000709311
9 juillet 2013
His application was rejected by the Migration Board ( Migrationsverket ) on 5 March 2010 and by the Migration Court ( Migrationsdomstolen ) on 28 September 2010.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1129DEC002283693
29 novembre 1995
N. also demanded that B. should be heard by the Board.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115DEC000862805
15 novembre 2005
On 6 September 2001 the Migration Board rejected the request and, on 2 April 2002, the Aliens Appeals Board upheld the Migration Board’s decision in full and ordered the applicants to leave Sweden within
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0624JUD001451889
24 juin 1993
On 26 May she went to the Invalidity Insurance Board’s headquarters to inspect her medical file, which had been sent there by the Appeals Board, but she was not allowed to see it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1010DEC001422088
10 octobre 1990
claim for the dismissal of the members of that Board.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0303DEC002202593
3 mars 1997
No property owner or holder of a related right was heard by the County Administrative Board.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1208DEC003065103
8 décembre 2005
It created a body called “Appeals Board”.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:C100053
14 janvier 2016
LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIÈRE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que la société Boulangerie tuniso-alsacienne (l'acquéreur) a acquis de la société Bongard
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC002732395
23 octobre 1997
The Board referred to an opinion submitted by the Social Insurance Office. This had not been communicated to the applicant and was not reproduced or summarised in the Board's decision.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14558
6 janvier 2026
Turkey , the Court had found a violation of Article 6 on account of the Arbitration Committee’s structural and institutional dependence on the Board of Directors coupled with the absence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC004592499
23 février 1999
Following the applicant’s appeal, the Aliens Appeals Board, on 16 April 1997, quashed the Immigration Board’s decision and referred the case back for re-examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0417JUD003502197
17 avril 2003
Hearings before land reform boards 42.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0312DEC003318096
12 mars 1998
In March 1995 the National Immigration Board (Statens invandrarverk) dismissed the applicant's request.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159658
1 décembre 2015
On 26 October 2008 the County Social Affairs Board rejected the appeal.
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2008:CO01027
21 octobre 2008
LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Lyon, 7 juin 2007), que la société Boccard qui s'est vu confier la fabrication
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC004592599
The applicant appealed to the Aliens Appeals Board.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623DEC006531313
23 juin 2020
The President’s decisions were based on an authorisation of 3 November 2009 issued by the Board of the Poznań Regional Court ( Kolegium Sądu Okręgowego – “the Board”).
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2015:CO00199
17 février 2015
attaqué (Rennes, 1er octobre 2013), que suivant une offre du 14 avril 2008, suivie de trois avenants, la société Aker Yards, devenue la société STX France (la société STX), a commandé à la société Boccard