Legislation may prescribe the manner of exercising these rights only if explicitly stated in the Constitution or necessary for the enjoyment of a specific right owing to its nature, it being understood

Finland (dec.), no. 1383/04, 31 May 2005).

    The Court notes that that in principle the manner in which a local official carried out his official duties was a matter of general interest to the community (see, among others, Sokołowski

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Ghedir and Others v.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3 .     The applicant was born in Ghazni and is of Hazara ethnicity.

There may be proceedings in which an oral hearing may not be required: for example, where there are no issues of credibility or contested facts which necessitate a hearing and the courts may fairly and

In the Court’s view, that contention amounts to granting an unfettered power to police officers in resorting to certain types of searches in a manner that may risk being contrary to the statutory requirements

France , cited above, § 47, ECHR 2002   IX). 124.

Means must be found of enabling complaints to be submitted to the Regional Prosecutor and the National Human Rights Office in a truly confidential manner.” Visit to Latvia of 5 to 12 May 2004 “77.

    On 28   May 2004 the Internal Security Office refused to initiate criminal proceedings.

    The applicant’s arrest in France 9.

    The applicant, Mr Frans Cornelis Adrianus van Anraat, is a Dutch national who was born in 1942.

He submitted that in May 2009 he had sold his car to a man, who introduced himself as Mr   E. and had shown his police ID. No formal papers had been signed.

  France , no. 5608/05, §   69, ECHR 2008 (extracts)).

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Lyubov Stetsenko v.

After considering the matter, it decided that none of the evidence offered could sufficiently substantiate the allegations in issue.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Aleksandr Zaichenko v.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Ustinova v.

It may be subject to editorial revision.

The Court is therefore unable to go into that matter. 45.