CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1010JUD003297220
10 octobre 2024
principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards
Page 16 sur 32
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD003054204
7 juillet 2009
In the present case it is also clear that there were no possibilities of hearing E. before a court taking into account her young age and the time that had elapsed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0923JUD001995505
23 septembre 2008
Essentially I have to weigh whether the evidence relied on by the defendant is both clear and cogent.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0614JUD001977604
14 juin 2011
It is not clear whether her application was ever examined. 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0313JUD000269408
13 mars 2012
The matter was not even clear after the House of Lords’ judgment in Savage and it was resolved by the Court of Appeal in the Rabone case. 58.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0916JUD007547201
16 septembre 2010
From his statements it is clear that he believes that the blows were inflicted on him by B., and not anyone else, and that it is his presumption.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0128JUD002182593
28 janvier 2000
23414/94) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) lodged with the Commission under former Article 25 of the Convention by two British nationals, Mr Kenneth McGinley and Mr Edward
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1013JUD003588014
13 octobre 2020
In the circumstances, it was sufficiently clear that there might also have been ill-treatment of the participants in the public event.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105DEC005407117
5 novembre 2020
It is clear that the conditions in IK-56 colony ran counter to the domestic legal requirements.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0114JUD003880012
14 janvier 2016
application (no. 38800/12) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Ukrainian national, Mr Eduard
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0530DEC006520201
30 mai 2006
Edwards solicitors, London. The Government are again represented by Mr C. Whomersley. The applicant was widowed on 27 June 1984. There was one child of the marriage, born on 1 July 1981.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC001571716
4 juin 2024
18821 in the Ercolano case, which was promptly published in all Italian legal journals, it was ultimately clear that those who had not submitted their request to be tried under the summary procedure
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC005171413
7 mars 2017
However, where it is clear from the outset that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0322DEC002210209
22 mars 2011
Article 2 requires that they take appropriate steps to safeguard the lives of those within their jurisdiction (see L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom , 9 June 1998, § 36, Reports 1998-III; and Paul and Audrey Edwards
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211DEC006104713
11 février 2014
The applicant, Mr Eduardo González Nájera, is a Spanish national who was born in 1974. He is currently serving a prison sentence in Logroño.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0410JUD003973198
10 avril 2003
In the spring of 1996 Mr Örn Clausen, husband of Mrs Justice Guðrún Erlendsdóttir, had sought a solution to certain financial problems arising from the inability of a debtor, Mr Edvard Lövdal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613DEC003259007
13 juin 2023
The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the legislative interference pending judicial proceedings in Italy (see, for example, Arras and Others
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109DEC003874597
9 novembre 1999
It concluded that that, according to the timings on the videos, the “third man” had been well clear of the junction between Berry Street and Chapel Lane by the time the landrover appeared.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD001488005
3 avril 2012
However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701JUD001007104
1 juillet 2008
The model had a clear legal basis and its execution was strictly controlled by the authorities (see, a contrario, Teixeira de Castro v.