CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11279
12 juillet 2016
France (11593/12) ; R.K. and Others v. France (68264/14) ; R.C. and V.C. v. France (76491/14) ; R.M. and Others v.
Page 16 sur 154
ECLI:CEDH:002-11273
France (11593/12) ; R.K. and Others v. France (68264/14) ; R.C. and V.C. v. France (76491/14) ; A.M. and Others v.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9269
5 décembre 2013
In 1977 the applicant attempted to re-establish contact with his mother through the French Consulate in Algiers, which informed him that she did not wish to make contact.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10231
2 octobre 2014
France - 32191/09 Judgment 2.10.2014 [Section V] Article 11 Article 11-1 Form and join trade unions Prohibition on members of the armed forces taking part in activities of professional associations: violation
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1020DEC004926412
20 octobre 2022
Leonid Aleksandrovich MOROZ 1971 RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES 1999 Kirill STEPANOV 1979 Richard Cook Chelmsford, the United Kingdom André Carbonneau Strasbourg, France
ECLI:CEDH:002-10230
France - 10609/10 Judgment 2.10.2014 [Section V] Article 11 Article 11-1 Form and join trade unions Prohibition on members of the armed forces taking part in activities of professional associations: violation
ECLI:CEDH:002-147
15 mars 2012
covering procedure for Greek nationals resident overseas to vote in parliamentary elections: no violation Facts – The applicants are two Greek nationals who are permanently resident in Strasbourg (France
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014DEC004331707
14 octobre 2010
E. came to the Centre on 30 March 2010 and told the psychologist that he did not wish to see the first applicant.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703JUD003030516
3 juillet 2018
Her mother does not wish her to visit her father, who has a new family and a small child. (...).” 9.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1208JUD004201018
8 décembre 2022
Hunger strikers rarely wish to die but some may be prepared to do so to achieve their aims. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD001709204
14 novembre 2013
The convicted persons did not indicate in their grounds of appeal their wish to be brought to the Supreme Court of the RF [Russian Federation].
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0730DEC000680903
30 juillet 2008
The declaration provided as follows: “...the Government hereby wish to express – by way of the unilateral declaration – their acknowledgement of the unreasonable duration of the domestic proceedings in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1016DEC007673701
16 octobre 2003
notes that in a number of cases in which an applicant died in the course of the proceedings it has taken into account the statements of the applicant’s heirs or of close family members expressing the wish
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013DEC005687613
13 octobre 2015
The declaration provided as follows: “The Government hereby wish to express – by way of the unilateral declaration – their acknowledgement of the violation of Articles 5 § 3 and 6 § 1 of the Convention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607DEC003532806
7 juin 2011
The declaration provided as follows: “(...) the Government hereby wish to express – by way of unilateral declaration – their acknowledgement of the fact that the applicant’s conditions of detention, in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0614DEC001492610
14 juin 2011
The declaration provided as follows: “...The Government hereby wish to express – by way of the unilateral declaration – their acknowledgement of the unreasonable duration of the applicant’s preparatory
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC004545106
11 décembre 2007
The declaration provided as follows: “(...) the Government hereby wish to express – by way of unilateral declaration — its acknowledgement of the unreasonable duration of the domestic proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC004288607
6 mai 2014
after the lodging of the application and that his heirs, Ms Joana Veljanovska, Mr Petar Veljanovski and Mr Blagoj Veljanovski, also Macedonian nationals, living in Bitola, expressed their wish
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1219JUD002045214
19 décembre 2018
Furthermore, the mufti had no jurisdiction over the testator’s wishes, which could not be circumscribed.
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:SO10084
22 janvier 2020
France et Linet France ne peuvent être retenus et établir la réalité d'un lien de subordination à l'égard de la société Linet France alors que cette organisation n'a pas été mise en oeuvre puisque Linet