When M.K. had tried to escape, the applicant had hit her with a hammer several times. He had then dealt several blows to B.J. and left the scene.

In the case at hand the order of 13   July 1998 had been contested by the applicant company and set aside, which meant that it had never entered into force.

Mr Lominadze claimed that the article indirectly suggested that he had acquired the summer house and an apartment in Tbilisi since becoming a parliamentarian in 1993 but, in reality, he had obtained most

He further submitted that he had been injured during an armed clash in November   1992 and since then had been unable to use his right hand.

  Fröhlich had driven and Markl had been at the rear with the applicant who had been handcuffed with his hands in front of his body.

The next day B.R. had seen the applicant in one of the rooms at the police station. He had had a black knitted hat on his head.

Since the damage sustained and the sum owed as compensation had only been established on the day the first-instance court judgment had been delivered, taking into account the circumstances prevailing at

The research done so far, including a report from 2011, had examined only a part of the files held and the researchers had gone through the files by hand.

In the light of those circumstances, the applicant’s handcuffing throughout his arrest which had lasted about four hours and which had not entailed being on public view, had not caused any physical injury

and on one occasion had had his mouth and hands taped with sellotape.

It considered on the one hand that the applicant had lived in Germany since 1978, that he was married with a German citizen and that he had 2 children in Germany.

that he had died.

In his first statement he claimed that the applicant had not objected to him holding her and that when he had suggested to her to take off her underwear she had willingly followed suit.

The traces of dust on his hands must have come either from shaking hands with C. or from the pen with which he signed the minutes. The applicant alleged that he had been set up by the police. 10.

Then they had tied his hands and had taken him away in their car. One of them had driven off with the applicant’s car.

For the same reasons, the fact that there has been a press libel case between Bengt Zachrisson on the one hand and the publisher of the SAF newspaper on the other, is irrelevant for the question of the

Nor had company S.M.I. recorded that sum in the statement related to the fiduciary account.

The officer A.P., who was questioned as a witness, stated that he had used a police dog which had led him near the P.K.’s house but then the dog had stopped.

paid the applicant the sum provided for in the judgment of 12 November 2002,   Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of Sweden, that it has exercised its

authorities’ refusal to hand over the publications in question. 24 .