Délibéré après l'audience du 27 mai 2025, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Rolin, présidente, Mme Topsi, conseillère, Mme Lebel, conseillère.

Délibéré après l'audience du 27 mai 2025, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Rolin, présidente, Mme Topsi, conseillère, Mme Lebel, conseillère.

Délibéré après l'audience du 27 mai 2025, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Rolin, présidente, Mme Topsi, conseillère, Mme Lebel, conseillère.

Guiserix, président, Mme Marcisieux, conseillère, Mme Lebel, conseillère. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 27 novembre 2025. La rapporteure, Signé I.

Le rapport de Mme Lebel a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique, les parties n’étant ni présentes, ni représentées. Considérant ce qui suit : M.

one month at each level.

  6232/20 and 22394/20, §§ 46-59, 1 March 2022), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

of jurisdiction   1 year, 10 months and 22 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   1 year, 7 months and 6 days 3 levels of jurisdiction     3 years and 16 days 3 levels of jurisdiction  

On 10 May 2004 the applicant retained the services of a lawyer and signed a contract of legal assistance with the said lawyer for EUR 1,500, to be paid for each level of jurisdiction.

Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Level of jurisdiction     37398/08 19/06/2008 Nina Tarasivna Perkovska 06/07/1946

case-law     27943/15 04/06/2015 Gábor Domokos 17/08/1953     10/02/2011   19/01/2015   3 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 10 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction     &

In particular, the Court notes that the applicants’ case has so far lasted less than five years at two levels of jurisdiction. This duration cannot yet be considered excessive.

On 10 April 2006 the applicant trade union lodged an application with the Timişoara Court of First Instance seeking recognition of its right of representation at company level.

of professionalism by ensuring a minimum and adequate education level in universities running in appropriate conditions.

#Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2005/29/EC - Articles 2(i) and 7(4) - Commercial communication published in a newspaper - Meaning of invitation to purchase - Entry-level price - Information

#Lexel AB mod Skatteverket.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.

À l'audience du 3 septembre 2024, Maître [Z] est représenté par son conseil, Maître Lenne.

The applicant alleged under Article 6 of the Convention that the proceedings were unfair because the benches of judges which convicted her both at first and last instance level failed to hear evidence